Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  21 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 21 / 100 Next Page
Page Background Table of Contents

|

The Academic Program

|

Courses at a Glance

|

www.havergal.on.ca

19

Determining the Report Card Grade

(p 39)

The teacher will:

consider all evidence collected through observations,

conversations, and student products with special

consideration given to more recent evidence

(p 39)

;

consider evidence for all assessments for evaluation

that the student has completed or submitted, the

number of assignments that were not completed or

submitted, and the evidence that is available for each

overall expectation;

consider that some evidence carries greater weight

than other evidence;

weigh all evidence of student achievement in light of

these considerations, and use professional judgement

to determine the student’s report card grade, which

represents the student’s achievement of overall

curriculum expectations, as demonstrated to that

point in time;

show students their report card grade prior to putting

it on the report card and explain to students how that

grade was determined.

In determining the report card grade, we have defined

“most consistent” and “most recent” to provide for

greater consistency, predictability and transparency:

Most consistent:

The most consistent level for a set of

marks is the level that more than half of marks either

equal or surpass.

Most recent:

When the majority of recent marks

lie above or below the most consistent level, the

overall mark will be raised or lowered.** (Dates for

determining which marks are considered recent

shift according to the reporting period and are set

according to the type of courses, e.g., semestered

full-year, non-semestered or half credit courses.)

Pegged levels:

the level for each category is pegged

according to a predetermined scale.

Grades are not determined using the arithmetic

mean or average but are based on the pattern in the

evidence the student has provided.

Exceptions:

For full year Upper School courses, the grade

for the November Report card is an average. For half

credit semester courses, the grade for the November

and April report card is an average.

Grades 1 to 6

For Grades 1 to 6, student achievement of the overall

curriculum expectations will be evaluated in accordance

with the achievement chart categories (knowledge/

understanding, thinking, communication and application)

and will be reported using four levels of understanding (

4

,

3

,

2

,

1

or

R

to indicate work that is incomplete)

(p 40)

.

Grades 7 to 12

For Grades 7 to 12, a student’s achievement of the overall

curriculum expectations will be evaluated in accordance

with the achievement chart categories (knowledge/

understanding, thinking, communication and application)

and will be recorded on the report card using percentage

marks

(p 40)

.

The conversion chart below shows how the four levels of

achievement are aligned to the percentage marks found

on the report cards:

(p 40)

Most Consistent/

Havergal Scale

Recent Level

4+

100

4

94

4-

85

3

75

2

65

1

55

R+

40

R

25

R-

10

0

0

The Meaning and Use of “I,” “R” and of percentage

marks below 50%

The code “R” represents achievement that falls below

Level 1 and is used in the evaluation and reporting of

student achievement in Grades 1 to 8. For achievement

below Level 1 in Grades 9-12, percentage marks below

50% are assigned on the report card

(p 41)

. Both “R”

and marks below 50% signal that additional learning is

required before the student begins to achieve success

in meeting the course expectations. For Grades 1 to

10, teachers may also use the code “I” on the report

card to indicate that insufficient evidence is available to

determine a final grade. In Grades 9 and 10, a student

who receives an “I” on the final report card to indicate

insufficient evidence will not receive a credit for the

course

(p 42)

.