Background Image
Previous Page  95 / 112 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 95 / 112 Next Page
Page Background

95

CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

Various guidelines for restoration projects have been devel-

oped, including strategies from the Society for Ecological Res-

toration (SER) International (SER, 2010). While such guide-

lines are available, it is imperative to stress the importance of

stakeholder involvement and particularly raising the awareness

of services provided by the ecosystems and the current and fu-

ture costs associated with their degradation and ultimate loss.

It is essential to raise awareness among the general public,

policy makers and environmental managers on the crucial role

ecosystems and biodiversity play in providing ecosystem ser-

vices. This includes a particular focus on water filtration and

supply, waste water cleaning, flood and storm barriers, polli-

nation, nutrients, pest- and erosion control, food security and

public health and poverty alleviation.

It is imperative that awareness is raised in relation to the costs

associated with ecosystem degradation, lost labor productiv-

ity, lost incomes from tourism and increased expenses in

production.

As many ecosystems are already degraded to some extent, of

the cost-savings, benefits and not the least potential solutions

to common political challenges that restoration can contribute

to. Already at this stage it is important to consider the stake-

holders involved.

Restoration is not a substitute to conservation, but if done with adequate planning and

multi-stakeholder involvement, can provide an effective tool for restoring lost ecosystem

services. The result should also provide great returns on these investments. However,

there are examples where restoration projects have failed or resulted in new problems

such as introducing pests or invasive species. The guidelines in this chapter are aimed at

reducing these risks.

If this awareness is available as the basis for decision mak-

ing – the actual implementation process also requires direct

considerations, which will vary highly from each specific site,

case and stakeholders involved: This includes (adopted from

SER, 2010):

Conceptual planning

identifies the restoration project site,

specifies its current state of health and the goals of restoration,

and provides relevant background information including stake-

holder involvement. Conceptual planning is conducted when

restoration appears to be a feasible option but before a final

decision has been made to exercise that option. Conceptual

planning provides preliminary information on the habitat or

ecosystem such as the identification of stressors, the extent/

health of its connectivity to the larger landscape, the need for

engineering and biotic interventions, and representative mea-

surements and surveys.

Preliminary tasks

are those upon which project planning de-

pends. These tasks form the foundation for well-conceived

restoration project design. Preliminary tasks include the docu-

mentation of existing site conditions (biotic and abiotic) includ-

ing baseline measurements, the establishment of a reference

model to guide the project work towards its intended goals,

planning for experimental plots within the large project, and

the appointment of a project manager and team with expertise