Previous Page  137 / 346 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 346 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUST

198

Transfer of a Business and

Protection of Employees

5

Rights

by

Gary Byrne, Solicitor

I

N the event of a change in ownership of a business, an

employee who remains in employment with the trans-

feree retains his or her rights under the Redundancy

Payments Acts 1967 to 1979, by virtue of the protections

afforded by Section 20 of the 1967 Act, as amended, and

the provisions of paragraphs 4 to 6 of the Third Schedule to

that Act. Similar protection is afforded under the Unfair

Dismissals Act 1977 and Minimum Notice and Terms of

Employment Act 1973 by virtue of the provisions of the

First Schedule to the 1973 Act, as amended by Section 20 of

the 1977 Act. Apart from employment rights deriving

from this legislation, there are a large number of other

terms and conditions of employment covered by contract

law. These rights were not specifically protected by law

until the enactment of Statutory Instrument No. 306 of

1980, The European Communities (Safeguarding of

Employees' Rights on Transfer of Undertakings) Regula-

tions 1980. The purpose of this article is to outline the

principle features of that Statutory Instrument. The

Regulations were made for the purpose of giving effect to

E.E.C. Council Directive No. 77/187/EEC of 14th

February 1977 and took effect in Ireland on 3rd November

1980.

The Statutory Instrument is unfortunately very badly

worded and, in some instances, incapable of precise inter-

pretation. Some of the more difficult provisions are

capable of interpretation by reference to the Directive

itself but in some instances, the Directive is also unfor-

tunately and imprecisely worded.

The first thing to note is that the Regulations are

expressed to apply to a transfer of a business. The

expression "transfer", however, is not defined in the

Regulations. The Council Directive states that it shall

apply to the transfer of an undertaking, business, or part of

a business to another employer as a result of a legal transfer

or merger.

There is no elaboration on this to explain what type of

legal transfer or merger it is proposed to cover. The

preamble to the Directive does state that it is necessary to

provide for the protection of employees' rights in the event

of a

change of employer.

In the explanatory memorandum

to the Regulations, the Department of Labour stated, in

November 1980, that the Regulations are aimed at safe-

guarding the rights of employees' in the event of the

transfer of ownership of undertakings which entailed a

change of employer. This point is further reinforced by the

fact that Ireland inserted a statement in the Council

Minutes of 31st January 1977, when the draft Directive

was discussed, to the effect that the Irish Delegation was

seriously concerned that the Directive, designed to

safeguard the acquired rights of employees in the cases of

mergers and take-overs, had failed to make provision in

relation to mergers involving changes in control over

undertakings. It appears clear, therefore, that the

Regulations apply only to a legal transfer or merger which

involves a change in identity of the employer. Share

mergers by means of which one company acquires control

of another without any change in identity of the employer

company would, therefore, be excluded from the scope of

the Regulations. As this is the most important and most

common type of change of ownership in our system of

company law, the Regulations might appear to have little

effect in this country. There remain, however, a number of

situations where a transfer is effected by asset merger,

including between members of a group of companies. In

the event of such mergers the Regulations would apply.

The Regulations to some extent aim at protecting

certain statutory rights which are already protected by our

domestic legislation, as stated above, but go further to

protect various contractual rights which would not

normally be protected in the absence of express agreement

between the parties. This automatic protection takes a

number of forms.

Paragraph 3 of the Regulations simply states that the

rights and obligations of a transferor arising from contracts

of employment, or employment relationships existing on

the date of a transfer, shall, by reason of such transfer, be

transferred to the transferee. There is, therefore, an

automatic transfer of all contractual obligations. The

Regulations do not totally prohibit the termination or

variation of contracts of employment consequent on, or

preceding, a transfer, subject to the provisions of

paragraph 5, below.

Paragraph 4(1) states that a transferee shall continue to

observe terms and conditions of any collective agreement

until the termination of such agreement. There is nothing

in this to prevent a transferee or a transferor negotiating a

new collective agreement, either prior to the transfer or

subsequent to the transfer. This would be an essential

requirement for most employers who are taking over a

business, if they were not satisfied with the provisions of an

existing collective agreement. Re-negotiation of the

collective agreement prior to the date of transfer would be

unaffected by the provisions of these Regulations.

Regulation 4(2) purports to deal with the difficult

problem of employees' rights to old age, invalidity, or

survivors benefits under supplementary company or

inter-company pension schemes outside the Social

Welfare Acts 1952 to 1979 (now the Social Welfare

Consolidation Act 1981). This sub-paragraph is most

unfortunately worded, but the poor draftsmanship cannot

be laid totally at the door of the Irish draftsman, as a

129