Previous Page  232 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 232 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

THE INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND,

SOLICITORS' BUILDINGS,

FOUR COURTS,

DUBLIN, N.W.8.

C/42/'j7.

z6ft July,

1957.

SOLICITORS REMUNERATION GENERAL ORDER 1957

Dear Sir/Madam,

The Council of the Incorporated Law Society of

Ireland have seen a copy of an anonymous com

munication which has been circulated to certain

members of the Dail and Seanad. The memorandum

is a complete misrepresentation of the facts in so

far as it states or suggests that the effect of the

Order would be

(a)

to abolish the present system of taxation of

costs by independent officers of the court, or

(If)

to remove all limitations on costs and make

solicitors the sole judges of reasonable pro

fessional charges, or

(i)

to relieve solicitors from the obligation of

vouching their professional charges and dis

bursements.

The true position in respect of these matters is

the converse of what is stated or suggested in the

memorandum, which contains other misrepresenta

tions and inaccuracies.

The internal evidence in the memorandum is

strongly indicative that its author has a vested

interest in the perpetuation of the present expensive

and complicated system but is not a person who is

at all concerned with the interests of clients.

It is

noteworthy that he has apparently obtained in

formation concerning the order prior to its signature.

The draft Order has been approved by the

Statutory Committee under

the Solicitors' Re

muneration Act 1881 consisting of the Chief Justice,

The President of the High Court, the Senior

Ordinary Judge of the Supreme Court and the

President of this Society.

It is inconceivable that

such a Committee would act without careful con

sideration.

The Council of this Society are confident that

no fair minded person will allow his views to be

coloured by an anonymous communication the

only possible effect of which could be to create

bias. A factual statement is enclosed for the informa

tion of those who are interested in acquainting

themselves with the true position.

Yours faithfully,

ERIC A. PLUNKETT,

Secretary.

C/42/'j 7.

SOLICITORS REMUNERATION GENERAL ORDER 1957

COSTS IN NON-CONTENTIOUS MATTERS

1. This Order which has been approved in

principle but not yet signed is the work of a Com

mittee consisting of four persons namely, the Chief

Justice, the President of the High Court, the Senior

Ordinary Judge of the Supreme Court and the

President of the Incorporated Law Society who

is the only solicitor on the Committee. This Com

mittee of eminence and impartiality have paid

due regard to all relevant matters before approving

the Order.

2. The Order which has been approved by the

Statutory Committee deals only with parts of a

solicitor's business and these are entirely uncon

nected with Court proceedings. The costs of Court

business are prescribed by different rules and have

not been changed.

3. The main effect of the new Order is to sub

stitute for a lengthy and involved bill of costs such

sum as is fair and reasonable having regard to all

the relevant circumstances and in particular :—

(a)

the complexity or difficulty of the case.

(b)

the amount or value of the property involved.

(<r)

the importance of the matter to the client.

(d)

the

skill

knowledge

and

responsibility

involved.

(e)

the number and importance of any documents

involved.

(/) the place and the circumstances in which the

business is transacted.

(g) the time expended.

4. The system described in paragraph 3

is bas

ically the same as the method used by accountants,

surveyors, medical practitioners, architects and

other professions.

As

regards non-contentious

business where the costs are paid by the client to

his own solicitor (and not by a third party as in

litigation) there is no reason why solicitors should

be in a different position from other professional

men. Much of the advisory work done by solicitors

and accountants is of a like nature, but an accountant

does not render an itemised bill. He charges a

gross sum on the general basis of paragraph 3 above.

It is not reasonable to expect solicitors to be gov

erned by an antiquated system which is not used

by other professions for similar work.

26