Previous Page  233 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 233 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

j. Under the present system if a client feels that

he has been overcharged his only redress is to have

the bill taxed. This will involve him in expense if

less than one sixth is taxed, off, as he will then be

liable for the costs of taxation. The Order contains the

following provisions for the protection of clients :—

(a)

The client will have the right to apply to the

Incorporated Law Society for a certificate,

which must be given free of charge stating

whether the amount of any bill is or is not

fair and reasonable, and, if it is too high, what

substituted sum would be a fair and reasonable

charge.

(b~)

The client will still have the right to have

the bill of costs taxed by application direct

to the Taxing Masters of the High Court

whether or not he has already obtained a

certificate from the Law Society. The Taxing

Master on such a reference will deal with the

matter independently.

(f) On any taxation of a bill it will be the duty

of the solicitor to satisfy the Taxing Master as

to the fairness and reasonableness of his charge.

(d~)

If the Taxing Master allows less than one

half of the amount charged he must bring

the facts of the case to the attention of the

Incorporated Law Society which may result

in disciplinary action against the solicitor.

(e)

The right of appeal from the Taxing Masters

to the Court will remain.

A solicitor furnishing a bill of costs will know

that it is subject to these tests. The Law Society

on reference to them and the Taxing Master on

taxation will be entitled to all necessary information

including the solicitor's files and documents to enable

them to judge the reasonableness of the charge.

6. The new system while allowing solicitors

reasonable remuneration would be an incentive to

efficiency and diligence. A solicitor who completes

business with exceptional skill or expedition would

be entitled to fair recompense for his additional

exertions. On the other hand a solicitor who is

dilatory or who transacts business in a roundabout

or negligent fashion would be liable to have his

remuneration reduced by the Taxation Masters.

It

is suggested that this principle, the value of the

work to the client, is an important benefit.

7. The Council of the Incorporated Law Society

are most anxious to increase the standard of pro­

fessional integrity and efficiency. They have shown

this by the promotion of the Solicitors Act, 1954

and by the steps which they have since taken for

the protection of clients against solicitors whose

conduct came to their notice.

They believe that

the new system would help the Society in main

taining this standard. The public interest would be

served by freeing the profession from archaic re

strictions while strengthening the hand of the

professional body in disciplinary matters.

8. The new system would help to reduce the

present unnecessary expense and delay in preparing

and furnishing bills of costs. No business concern

could stand the expense of ascertaining charges and

furnishing accounts which

the present system

imposes on solicitors. The following is an actual

example of a solicitor and own client bill of costs

taxed by a solicitor for a public body. It is typical

of many others.

Gross profit costs for year's work

£1,173

Disbursements

...

...

...

331

Total

...

£1,504

Taxed off

£40

The expenses of drawing and taxing the bill which

resulted in a reduction of £40 were as follows :—

(a)

Costs drawer's com

mission

...

... £103

(V)

Costs drawer's scriv-

enery charges

...

38

(c)

Costs drawer's petty

disbursements

...

9

(W) Duty on costs

...

39(seenote

(d)

below)

(e)

Taxation items in bill

44

(/)Fee to solicitor and

costs drawer oppos

ing bill

...

...

31

£264 = 22.5% of the

solicitor's profit

costs as drawn.

Items

(a) (b)

and

(c)

£150 were paid by the solicitor

to his costs drawer ;

items

(d) (e)

and (/) £114 were

added to the bill and paid by the local authority

NOTE (d) This bill was taxed in 1953. The duty payable

to the Taxing Office which was then £7 16 o would be £39

to-day under the Fees Order made by the Minister for Justice

in 1956. The higher figure has been included in order to

show the present position.