Previous Page  268 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 268 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

4. The following amendments shall be made in the Rules

applicable to Part II of Schedule I to the Order of 1884 :—

(a)

In Rule I for the words " according to the present

system as altered by Schedule II " there shall be sub

stituted the words " in accordance with Schedule 11

hereto."

(b)

In Rule 4 for the words " are to be dealt with under

the old system as altered by Schedule II " there shall

be substituted the words " are to be calculated in accord

ance with Schedule II hereto."

5. The

following Schedule

shall

be

substituted

for

Schedule II to the Order of 1884 :—

" SCHEDULE II.

For any business, not being contentious business, for

which no charge is prescribed by Schedule I, or in respect

of which the solicitor has, in accordance with clause 6

of this Order, elected to charge under Schedule II, the re

muneration shall be such sum as may be fair and reasonable

having regard to all relevant circumstances and in particular

to—

(1) the complexity, importance, difficulty, rarity or urgency

of the questions raised ;

(2) where money or property is involved, its amount or

value ;

(3) the importance of the matter to the client ;

(4) the skill, labour, specialised knowledge and responsi

bility involved on the part of the solicitor ;

(5) the number, character and importance of the documents

prepared or perused ;

(6) the place where, and the circumstances in which, the

business, or any part thereof, is transacted ;

and

(7) the time expended by the solicitor and his staff:

Provided that—

(a)

Without prejudice to the provisions of the Solicitors

(Ireland) Act, 1849, the client may require the solicitor

to obtain a certificate from the Incorporated Law Society

of Ireland certifying that the sum charged is fair and

reasonable or, if it is not, what is a fair and reasonable

sum and the sum so certified, if less than that charged,

shall, in the absence of taxation be the sum payable ;

(If)

before the solicitor brings proceedings to recover

costs on a bill delivered under this Schedule, he must,

unless the costs have been taxed, have drawn the attention

of the client in writing—

(i) to his right under paragraph

(a)

of this proviso to

require the solicitor to obtain a certificate from

the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland, and

(ii) to the provisions of the Solicitors (Ireland) Act,

1849, with regard to taxation of costs ;

(e)

the client shall not be entitled to require the solicitor

to obtain a certificate from the Incorporated Law Society

of Ireland under paragraph

(a)

of this proviso after the

bill has been either taxed or paid ;

(d)

on any taxation of a bill delivered under this

Schedule it shall be the duty of the solicitor to satisfy

the Taxing Master as to die fairness and reasonableness

of his charge ;

and

(e)

if the Taxing Master allows less than one-half of

the amount charged, he shall bring the facts of the case

to the attention of the Incorporated Law Society of

Ireland."

6. The Solicitors' Remuneration General Order (No. 2),

1920, is hereby revoked.

7. This Order shall apply to all business in respect of which

a bill of costs shall not have been furnished before the lorh da y

of October, 1957.

DATED THIS

IOTH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1957.

CONCHUBHAIR A. MAGUTDHIR,

Chief Justice.

CAHIR DAVITT,

President of the High Court.

CECIL LAVERY,

Senior Ordinary Judge of the

Supreme Court.

NIALL S. GAFFNEY,

President, Incorporated Law

Society of Ireland.

On November I3th the Minister for Justice on

behalf of the Government proposed a resolution

in Seanad Eireann asking the Government to dis

allow the Order. The motion was carried by 23

votes to 21 and by the Solicitor's Remuneration

General Order, 1957 (Disallowance) Order, 1957

(S.I. No. 232 of 1957) the Government disallowed

the Order. The following report from a special

Committee of the Council was read at the Ordinary

General Meeting on November 2ist.

It is our duty to make a report to the Society on a matter

which has caused the greatest concern not only to the Council

but to every practising solicitor, namely the motion disallowing

the Order of the statutory body under the Solicitors' Re

muneration Act. The members of the Statutory Body are

the Chief Justice, the President of the High Court, the Senior

Ordinary Judge of the Supreme Court, and the President

for the time being of the Society.

In July last the Statutory Body proposed to make a General

Order under the Solicitors' Remuneration Act, 1881, adopting

in principle the system of costs for non-contentious business

outside Court which has been in operation in Great Britain

since 1953. This is a gross sum of such amount as shall be

fair and reasonable and the tests of fairness and reasonableness

are set out in detail. Basically the method proposed is that

which is used in most other professions for similar work.

The Order provided two safeguards which are peculiar to the

solicitors' profession, firstly the client's right to obtain free

of charge a certificate from the Society as to the reasonableness

or otherwise of the charge, and secondly an over-riding right

to have the bill taxed by the Taxing Master.

A copy of the proposed Order was sent by the Statutory

Body to the Department of Justice early in July. The Body

intended to make the Order on 9th October. Late in July

an anonymous circular was posted to certain members of the

Oireachtas which, in

the guise of protecting the public

interest, sought to misrepresent the real effect of the Order

Realising the serious nature of these misstatements the Council

immediately circulated an answering statement of the facts

and the interview was sought with the Department of Justice.

On September 3rd the Secretary of the Society wrote to the

Department repeating a verbal request already made in

July to the Minister to receive a deputation. On 7th Septem

ber the Society received a letter from the Department in

timating that the Minister had seen the documents and

" doubted whether any useful purpose would be served by

receiving a deputation unless the Council proposed to advance

further arguments ",

61.