Previous Page  75 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 75 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

Vol. 49

No. 8

FEBRUARY,

1956

THE GAZETTE

of the

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

President

DERMOT P. SHAW

Vice-Presidents

RALPH J. WALKER

GEORGE G. OVEREND

Secretary

ERIC A. PLUNKETT

FOR CIRCULATION AMONG MEMBERS

MEETINGS OF THE COUNCIL.

JANUARY i ZTH :

The President in the Chair. Also

present:

Francis J. Gallagher, Thomas O'Reilly,

William J. Norman, Terence de Vere White,

Cornelius J. Daly, F. X. Burke, H. St. J. Blake,

Ralph J. Walker, R. McD. Taylor, Francis J.

Lanigan, Desmond J. Collins, Patrick R. Boyd,

Joseph P. Tyrrell, Patrick F. O'Reilly, John "R.

Halpin, Derrick M. Martin, James R. Quirke,

Scan O'hUadhaigh, Peter E. O'Connell, John J.

Sheil, Francis J. Gearty, Charles J. Downing,

John J. Nash, George A. Nolan, James J. O'Connor,

George G. Overend, Dermot P. Shaw, John

Carrigan, Arthur Cox, Desmond Mayne, Joseph

Barrett, Niall S. Gaffney.

The following was among the business transacted :

Clients' Privilege.

A MEMBER wrote stating that his deceased partner

had handled a client's business and received pro

fessional communications. Litigation had followed

between the client and a third party and member's

firm was no longer acting. He had been summoned

as a witness to give evidence as to the conversations

between the former client and the deceased partner

and enquired whether the communications were

privileged. The Council were of opinion that the

communications are privileged and the privilege

must be claimed. The client is entitled to waive the

privilege.

If directed by the judge member must

testify.

In another case member acted for a client on a

sale and proceedings have been brought against the

client arising out of the matter. Member was not

acting in the proceedings.

In the client's defence

she made allegations of deceit and -Fraud against

member who had been summoned by the plaintiff

to give evidence.

He enquired whether he is

entitled to do so or whether the privilege had been

waived by the allegations made against him by the

former client. The Council were of opinion that the

client had probably waived the privilege by implica

tion by making allegations against her former

solicitor and that member was probably entitled to