Previous Page  300 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 300 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1 9 88

A View from Vienna

The 16th Annual Conference of

Presidents of European Law

Societies took place in Vienna

between 12th/14th February, 1988.

De l ega t i ons headed by their

respective Presidents attended

from all the European countries

including those from the Eastern

Block and in all 27 countries were

represented at the Conference. At

the same time, the International Bar

Association ran a Seminar on

"Mu l ti Disciplinary Partnerships"

and the Union International des

Avocats ran a Seminar on "Mus ic

and the Law".

The importance of attending the

Conference was shown to me by

the variety of topics which were

discussed, but perhaps more

importantly, it vividly brought home

to me the fact that we are

European and must be seen to be

European and that our horizons

must be broadened outside the

shores of our island.

At the Converence, each country

read a short report on the present

situation of the legal profession in

t hat country, and t hen sub-

sequen t ly eight papers were

prepared based on replies to ques-

tionnaires sent to the Law Society

of each European country.

By far the most important paper

was that on Multi Disciplinary Part-

nerships or MDPs as they are

called. The concept of MDPs is an

amalgamation of a number of pro-

fessionals in one partnership such

as a solicitor, an accountant, a tax

adviser, a financial consultant and

if it is wished to extend it further,

an estate agent, a surveyor, and

basically any profession which

could be doing a job related to the

task in hand. Already these are

accepted in Germany and Holland

and the representatives of Spain,

Switzerland and Denmark felt that

they were comi ng in their

countries.

The question was posed as to

whether the legal profession should

join wi th the other professions in

providing a "one stop" source of

services or should it remain

separate and distinct and deal with

its own field of expertise. It was

pointed out that in the continental

countries, accountants work as

auditors represented only 55% of

accountancy work and the balance

was represented by tax insolvency

and company work. The argument

against allowing MDPs was based

on the independence of the lawyer,

which it was felt important to

maintain on the grounds that the

lawyer was the person who gave

the independent advice that most

people found to be absolutely

necessary in their transactions.

Arguments were raised by some

delegates that the new system

would be less confidential than the

existing system and the meeting

was generally divided with opinions

expressed for and against the

envisaged new form of partnership.

The Chairman summed it up by

expressing the view that Multi Dis-

c i p l i na ry Partnerships wou ld

probably come with the legal pro-

f ess i on j o i n i ng

w i t h

other

professions who did similar types

of work such as accountants and

tax advisers but not w i t h

professions doing different types of

work such as architects, engineers

and surveyors.

It is interesting to note that the

problem has been considered by

the English Law Society, who have

decided to make no decision on the

basis that there is not a sufficiently

strong consensus of opinion within

the profession to support a change

of the magnitude envisaged. It feels

there is i nsu f f i c i ent common

g r ound be t ween p r o f ess i ons

whose members might enter into

partnerships on the terms on which

such pa r t ne r sh i ps mi ght be

permitted to operate. Instead they

are prepared to allow a system of

profit sharing with non-solicitor

employees provided a partnership is

not thereby formed. They also

propose to introduce a code of

conduct which would seek to

balance the flexibility required to

develop solicitors practices in the

competitive environment in which

they now operate w i t h t he

maintenance of the independence

of the solicitor.

It would seem certain that Ireland

is going to have to face similar

challenges. Accordingly it seems to

me that we must improve the

standard of our qualification by

devoting more time to education

and training particularly in the

commercial law area. Secondly we

must be able to provide solicitors

with specialities in particular fields

who are in a position to provide

consultant or referral service to the

profession and finally, it seems that

the trends will once again move

towards larger firms particularly in

the city relating to commercial law.

Other points which emerged

from the Conference are that there

is going to be a serious shortage of

(Right) The President, Th omas D. Sh aw, w i t h his w i f e , Yvonne,

a t t end i ng t he J u r i s ts Ball at t he Ho f b u rg Palace, Vienna.

64