Previous Page  504 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 504 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1988

and differences in substantive and

procedural law. However, for those

lawyers wishing to avail of the new

o p p o r t u n i t i es c r ea t ed by t he

proposed completion of the Internal

Market, the decisions in

Gullung

a n d t h e

German

case

w i ll be

considered very helpful.

An eminent U.K. lawyer/journalist

writing recently in relation to the

German

case

stated (perhaps

optimistically)

5

"Businessmen will

find this decision of the European

Court reasonable. Lawyers will

think it very bold. If foreign lawyers

are enterprising enough to make

use of it and appear in the High

Court, the Court of Appeal and the

House of Lords, they will drive a

coach and horses through the rules

of the Bar and of the Law Society.

It could certainly open up the

lawyers' world".

FOOTNOTES

1

Case 2 9 4 / 86 Gullung -v- Conseils des

Ordres des Avocats des Barreaux de

Colmar et de Saverne and Others, 19th

January, 1988, The Times 2 0 th

January, 1988; 119881. 2 C.M.L.R. 57.

2

Case 4 2 7 / 8 5. Commission of the

European Communities -v- the Federal

Republic of Germany, 25th February,

1988.

3

0. J. 78/17, 26/3/77. Council Directive

7 7 / 2 49 EEC to facilitate the effective

exercise by lawyers of freedom to

provide services.

4

S.I. No. 58 of 1979, as amended by S.I.

No. 197 of 1981 (Greek lawyers).

5

A. H. Herman. "Lawyers without Fron-

tiers". Financial Times, 10th March,

1987.

EMPLOYMENT

FORUM

The next

EMPLOYMENT FORUM

will be held in the President's

Hall, Blackhall Place, Dublin 7,

at 6 . 00p .m. on Thursday, 27

October, 1988.

Admission

is free and

all

interested

solicitors

and

solicitors'

apprentices

are

welcome.

Bo ok Rev i ew

THE CONS T I T U T I ON OF

I RE L AND

By Frank Litton (editor). Special

Issue of Adm i n i s t r a t i o n, volume

35 No. 4, 1987.

Institute of Public Administration,

1988, 255 pp. £6).

Frank Litton, the editor, in a per-

ceptive but short introduction to this

Festchrift on the fiftieth anniversary

of the people's adoption of the

Constitution, rightly pronounces

that "Constitution-making requires

that the cunning of a Machiavellian

prince be joined to the wisdom of

a philosopher king". Constitutional

interpretation demands similar

qualities.

Some of our modern Irish legal

philosophers and interpreters of our

Constitution contribute essays in

the form of analyses and critiques

of the Constitution. The most

lengthy of the contributions was

written by Dr. Dermot Keogh who

documents the often painstaking

processes involved in the drafting of

the Constitution and Article 44 in

particular. Dr. Keogh recounts the

various pilgrimages to the Vatican

seeking approval for the articles on

religion wh i ch ended w i th the

Pope's immortal words: "Ni approvo

ni non disapprovo; taceremo". ("I do

not approve, neither do I not

disapprove; we shall maintain

silence"). Dr. Enda McDonough,

Professor of Moral Theology at St.

Pa t r i ck 's College,

Ma y n o o t h,

describes the reaction of De Valera

to the Pope's negative attitude to

the draft Constitution: "Pius XI was

a tough northerner. I have had to

deal all my life w i t h t o u gh

northerners like Sean McEntee and

Frank Aiken so I knew I would have

to fight". Despite the friendship De

Valera shared wi th Dr. John Charles

McQuaid, ecclesiological differ-

ences separated them on certain

issues. Yet Dr. McQuaid must have

been pleased wi th his endeavours.

Walsh J. writes on constitutional

rights. Incidentally, Barrington J.

recollects Tommy Conolly, S.C.

describing Brian Walsh in the 1960s

as the person who was "writing the

constitutional law of this country".

Professor John Kelly, who had the

o p p o r t u n i ty

of

reading

t he

contributions, described Walsh J's

essay as being " f u ll of material

provoking either challenge or

applause". Walsh J. in a wide-

ranging essay considers the natural

law and the nature of fundamental

rights in the Constitution.

The courts and the Constitution

are considered by Barrington J. The

learned judge describes the expand-

ing influence of the Constitution

from its early days to the present

time. He describes how the judges

were fearful in the early days of the

State, lest any form of judicial

a c t i v i sm in i n t e r p r e t i ng t he

Constitution would involve them in

political, social and economic issues

in which the judges had no special

competence. Those days are gone

forever. Barrington J. makes many

interesting observations but of par-

ticular interest is his description of

Tommy Conolly, S.C. as the father of

modern Irish Constitutional law.

Keane J., judge, prolific jurist and

President of the Law Reform Com-

mission, in a masterly essay

cons i de rs issues relating to

Administrative and Planning Law in

the context of the Constitution. He

reflects on the immense growth in

the public service and the dominant

role it plays in Irish life and he notes

that challenges to actions of the

execu t i ve meet w i t h a more

sympathetic and less sceptical

response in present times than in

former times.

An t hony Coughlan, a senior

lecturer in Trinity College, Dublin,

writes on the Constitution and

Agricultural Consultant

Services include

Damage and Loss Assessment,

C.P.O.'s, Insurance Claims,

Professional Evidence in Courts

T. P. Curran,

M.Agr.Sc

.

20, Lakelands, Naas, Co. Kildare

Tel: (045) 66941

Handwriting & Subject

Document Analysis

Michael Rasmussen,

Mayanncor Ltd.

19, Woodside, Rathnew,

Co. Wicklow.

Telephone: 0404-69474

2 64