Previous Page  212 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 212 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

owned by the developer. The developer forged the

petitioner's signature to the transfer. The accounts

showed that the company made no profit in the trans-

action. Company B sold the two acres to Company C

which also belonged to the developer, and all the devel-

oper's shares in Company C were subsequently sold by

him to Mr. D, for £15,000, making a net profit of

£14,280.

The petitioner was interested to develop houses in

Whitestrand Road, Galway, held by Company E in

which the developer held most of the shares. The

developer wished that the Westwinds Company should

guarantee payment to Allied Irish Banks of the over-

draft granted to Company E, and fraudulent minutes

were furnished to the Bank, stating that the petitioner

had been present, although he had not, and that the

guarantee had allegedly been signed by him. The reso-

lution also authorised the developer to deposit the title-

deeds by way of equitable mortgage to the Bank. The

developer certified that a true copy of the minutes had

been delivered to the Bank, and, as he wished to con-

ceal the business being transacted from the petitioner,

he did not notify him. Apart from that, there were a

number of meetings of the company and of the direc-

tors, and the petitioner was never notified; the minutes

of the meetings held in 1970 and in 1971 were not

signed, and from 1972, they were signed by the devel-

oper. At a meeting in March 1973, at which the

developer and his wife were present, it was resolved

that the petitioner be removed from office as secretary

and director and the developer was appointed in his

place as secretary.

The petitioner presents a petition under Section 205

of the Companies Act, which deals with the powers of a

minority shareholder to petition the Court on the

ground that directors conduct the company in an

oppressive manner. He claims that the agreement of

21 July 1965 is valid, and the Judge accepts his evid-

ence, and that of his solicitor. But on that date only the

heads of an agreement were reached which were subse-

quently to be set out in a detailed contract. This

preliminary agreement did not constitute a contract,

and was not binding on the parties, and the terms

thereof were in any event subsequently rescinded by

mutual consent.

The sale of the lands at Knocknacarra by Westwinds

for £730 was made at a gross undervalue in 1968, on

the basis that the two acres were only agricultural land,

but nevertheless planning permission was granted to

build upon this land in 1973, which enabled Company

C belonging to the developer to sell it for £15,000. The

original sale thus benefited the developer alone to the

exclusion of the other members of the company. Conse-

quently the sale of the lands at Knockacarra was an

exercise by the directors of their powers in a manner

which was fraudulent and oppressive to the petitioner,

and was in total disregard of his interest as a member

of the company.

The mortgage by deposit of title deeds in May 1972

relating to Whitestrand Road to guarantee the amount

which Company E owed Allied Irish Banks was not for

the benefit of Westwinds or of the petitioner. 1 he

forgery of the petitioner's signature to the minutes of

the meeting, as well as of his signature to the parti-

culars of the charge indicated that the developer was

anxious to conceal the transaction. This is the first case

in Ireland under Section 205 of the 1963 Act. As

Westwinds has ceased trading and a winding-up by the

Court would be expensive, the fairest order would be

to direct the developer to purchase the shares of the

petitioner at a price fixed by the Court. In this connec-

tion, the Knocknacarra lands will be deemed to belong

to Westwinds, and, as regards Whitestrand Road, the

developer must purchase the lands at full market price.

The price will be fixed on the basis that there are no

restrictions on the transfer of the petitioner's share in

the company, and that the directors would sanction the

transfer. Accordingly, the developer is to purchase all

the petitioner's share in Westwinds at a price deter-

mined at an inquiry held before a Judge.

[Re Westwinds Holding Co. Ltd. and Re Companies

Act, 1963; Kenny J.; unreported; 21 May 1974.]

New President of English Law Society

Edward Henry Sibbald Singleton, M.A.

Better known as "Tim", Mr. E. H. S. Singleton, born

in 1921, is one of the youngest solicitors to be elected

President of The Law Society. He was educated at

Shrewsbury and Brasenose College, Oxford. He is a

nephew of the late Lord Justice Singleton.

His admission on 1 July 1949 is nearly twenty-five

years to the day of his election to the Presidency, which

also makes him the first President to be admitted since

the war.

After qualifying, he spent five years with Richards

Butler & Co. and joined his present firm Macfarlanes

in 1954.

In 1961 Mr. Singleton was elected to the Council of

The Law Society and he has been a most-active member,

serving until 1964 on the Education and Training

Committee, from then until 1972 on the Contentious

Business Committee and thereafter on the Professional

Purposes Committee. He became Chairman of the Legal

Aid Committee in 1965, and continued in that position

until 1969 when he was appointed Chairman of the

Contentious Business Committee. In 1973 he chaired a

Working Party of Council Members to consider all the

activities and finances of The Society and at about the

same time he became a member of the Committee of

Management of the Paddington Neighbourhood Advice

Bureau and Law Centre.

He represents No. 2 constituency, which is covered

by the City of London Solicitors' Company, and he is

a Member of their Court. During his Vice-Presidential

Year he travelled widely on Law Society business.

"Tim" Singleton's family roots lie in Lancashire, but

he was born and brought up in Herefordshire and now

lives and practices in London. He is keenly interested in

cricket, having played for Oxford University, and for

six years has been President of The Law Society's Cricket

Club, for which he continues to be a playing member.

He and his wife Peggy and their four children spend as

much time as possible in East Anglia where they have

a small house and a boat.

210