Previous Page  30 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

How did you come up with the

‘modular buildings’ idea?

The idea underpinning large integrated

modular plants arose while Warwick Jack-

son was the lead electrical engineer for

Anglo American – Kumba Iron Ore – SSP

on the development of its operations in

the Northern Cape. He had been told that

it was not feasible to build large substa-

tions offsite, because they could not fit into

standard ISO shipping containers, making

delivery impossible.

“After the meeting, I happened to be

driving behind a Komatsu 960 haul truck.

At 11,6 mwide, I realised that products five

times wider than conventional ISO contain-

ers were being routinely delivered to sites

all over Africa,” Jackson says.

On discussing his observation with

his switchgear colleagues, Jackson was

advised to talk to Efficient Engineering.

“Johan Basson, who ran RBF at that time,

now JB Switchgear, recommended Ef-

ficient, which, he said, was not afraid of

size,” he recalls.

“That is where my relationship with Ef-

ficient began. I met Tony Cimato, the then

owner, who showed us how the company

made large buildings, control rooms and

huge shell structures to house equipment:

for shiploaders, e-houses, and reclaimers,

for example,” he adds.

For Kolomela, Efficient Engineering

was willing to build the shells for the sub-

stations, Motor Control Centres (MCCs)

and Control and Instrumentation (C&I)

rooms as single integrated modules, and

fully equip them offsite. “So my staff and

I were given an office here at Efficient,

where we collaborated to build exactly

what we needed for Kolomela. It was a

fantastic way of working,” Jackson says.

What was needed for Kolomela?

The result was the development of seven

‘buildings’ that met the project require-

ments for the entire electrical infrastruc-

ture needed at Kolomela: For the primary,

secondary and tertiary crushers, the run-

of-mine conveyor; the product screen,

the load out station and the dewatering

pump station.

“It was an amazing success. The

modular plants arrived on site 100% com-

missioned. Our slogan was from

motor to

mouse

. Only once everything was signed

off at Efficient Engineering, did we arrange

delivery to site. Once there, we connected

the power cables and everything worked,”

he says.

Were you able to remain within

your budget?

On the Kolomela project, Anglo had a

R500 M budget for the electrical and C&I

infrastructure. For the seven substations,

the building budget was R11 M. “By tak-

ing the offsite modular approach, the shell

structures cost close to R15 M, but by the

time we had completed the installation,

we had under-spent our R500 M electri-

cal budget by R83 M,” Jackson says. So

by agreeing to spend R4 M extra on the

offsite modular construction approach,

R79 M was saved.

The main reason? “The provisional

and general budget virtually disappeared,

because all the work was done offsite. Very

few contactors had to be paid for travel,

accommodation or material shipping costs

to the site. In addition, the contingency

budget went unspent, because there were

no unexpected additional costs due to

onsite issues.

Following the successful deployment of sevenmodular ‘buildings’ for the electrical infrastructure at

the Kolomela mine, Efficient Engineering has pioneered the offsite construction, assembly, testing

and commissioning of complete modular plants similar to these, which include the containment

structures and all functional equipment. Crown Publications

editor, Peter Middleton, talks toWarwick Jackson, now the

managing director of Efficient Power and the inspiration

behind this new approach.

I n C o n v e r s a t i o n W i t h

TRANSFORMERS + SUBSTATIONS

Peter Middleton

Warwick Jackson

Electricity+Control

February ‘16

28