RM Winter 2016 FLIP

59 / 88

Reading Matters
Teaching Matters
Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 | |57|
knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and
learning. Learning and Instruction, 19, 376–386.
Beers, K., Probst, R., & Rief, L. (2007).Adolescent Literacy: Turning Promise into
Practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bender, W. (2002). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Berezina, K. (2011). The impact of the use of blogs on students’assignment
engagement. Journal of Hospital Leisure Sports and Tourism Education, 10(1),
99-105.
Boling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., Barton, K., & Neirlich, T. (2008). Collaborative
literacy: Blogs and internet projects. The Reading Teacher, 61(6), 504-506.
Botte, L. (2014, January 15). Telling stories about culture and geography with
green screen tech! #thanksTarrantInstitute #emsvt #bsdvt [Tweet]. Retrieved from
Boyd, P. (2013). Blogging in the classroom: Using technologies to promote learner-
centered pedagogies. Researcher: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 85-113.
Bramlett, R. K. (1994). Implementing cooperative learning: A field study
evaluating issues for school-based consultants. Journal of School Psychology, 32(1),
67-84.
Bryan, A. (2011, January 1). Elementary Reading Fluency and Comprehension: Do
Laptops Make a Difference?ProQuest LLC .
Celsi, R., &Wolfinbarger, M. (2002). Discontinuous Innovation: Waves of Change
for Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(1), 64-72.
Chen, Y. L., Liu, E. Z. F., Shih, R. C., Wu, C. T., & Yuan, S. M. (2011). Use of peer
feedback to enhance elementary students’writing through blogging.British
Journal of Educational Technology 42(1).
Chi, T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-
explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. (2013). Effects of educational technology applications
on reading outcomes for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading
Research Quarterly, 48(3), 277-299.
Day, D., & Kroon, S. (2010).“Online Literature Circles Rock!”Organizing Online
Literature Circles in a Middle School Classroom. Middle School Journal (J3), 42(2),
18-28.
De Grave, W. S., Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2001). Effects of problem-
based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first
year medical students. Instructional Science, 29, 33–44.
Delacruz, S. (2014). Using Nearpod in Elementary Guided Reading Groups.
Techtrends: Linking Research And Practice To Improve Learning, 58(5), 62-69.
Diller, D. (2011).Math work stations: Independent learning you can count on, K-2.
Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
Dils, A.K. (2000). Using technology in a middle school social studies classroom.
International Journal of Social Education,15(1), 102-112.
Dimino, J. A., Simon, E., & Vaughn, S. (2007).Collaborative strategic reading (CSR):
Improving reading comprehension skills. National Center on Secondary Education
and Transition (NCSET) Conference Call Presentation, September 17, 2002.
Dotger, S., & Causton-Theoharis, J. (2010). Differentiation through choice: Utilizing
a think-tac-toe for science content.Science Scope, 33 (6), 18-23.
Gallagher, J. (2010).“As Y’all Know”: Blog as Bridge. Teaching English in the Two-
Year College, 37(3), 286-94.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York,
NY: Basic Books.
Halic, O., Lee, D., Paulus, T., Spence, M. (2010). To blog or not to blog: Student
perceptions of blog effectiveness for learning in a college-level course. Internet
and Higher Education, 13, 206- 213.
Harris, T., & Hodges, R. (Eds.) (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of
reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hasbrouck, J. E., & Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms
for students in grades 2 through 5. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24(3), 41-44.
Hicks, D. & Swan, K. (2006). Through the democratic lens: the role of purpose in
leveraging technology to support historical inquiry in the social studies classroom.
International Journal of Social Education, 21(2), 142-168.
Jones, J. Burr, S., Kaufmann, L., & Beck, J. (2013). Beyond the fluff: Integrating fine
arts in the common core classroom.Focus on Inclusive Education, 10(4). 1-7
Kimbell-Lopez, K. (2003). Just think of the possibilities: Formats for reading
instruction in the elementary classroom.Reading Online, 6. Retrieved from www.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Ahwee, S. (2004).
Collaborative strategic reading: Real world lessons from classroom teachers.
Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291–302.
Kostons, D., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The effects of activating prior topic and
metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores. British Journal of
Educational Psychology 85(3), 264–275.
Learning Point Associates. (2006). The National Reading Panel Report: Practical
advice for teachers. Retrieved from
nationalreading.pdf.
Lee, S., Irving, K., Pape, S., & Owens, D. (2015). Teachers’Use of Interactive
Technology to Enhance Students’Metacognition: Awareness of Student Learning
and Feedback. Journal Of Computers In Mathematics And Science Teaching, 34(2),
175-198.
Levy, S., Coleman, M., & Alsman, B. (2002). Reading instruction for elementary
students with emotional/ behavioral disorders: What’s a teacher to do? Beyond
Behavior, 11(3), 3-10.