Reading Matters
Technology Matters
CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTSReading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |
scira.org|
61
|
checklist was designed to be
flexible and inclusive, so it
honored the “effectiveness”
of diverse teaching methods.
Plus, I wrote the first two
qualifiers so they directly
addressed the ability to read
and communicate content-
area texts, which is a central
premise of disciplinary literacy
(Moje, 2008; Moss, 2005). As I
visited classrooms, I recorded
the effective teaching
methods I observed, and I
will next offer a synopsis of
three exemplary methods.
Inspiring
Approaches
In my classes, I often
tell my pre-service teachers, “There is no one way to get to
Denver. The point is that you get to Denver.” By this statement,
I mean that there is not a single, magical method for correctly
teaching a topic. Instead, the purpose of teaching a lesson
is that students learn the objective that was taught (e.g., the
“getting to Denver”). In this section, I offer three mini-vignettes
that each capture a teaching method and analyze them
using the Effective Teaching Traits checklist from Table 2.
Method 1: The Silent Seminar
I sat in the back of a high school American government
classroom with another university supervisor, and 20 students were
seated in rows of tables (averaging two students per table and
three tables per row). All of the students had a tablet device and
were logged onto a shared Google Drive document. Before starting
the seminar, the teacher and intern quickly discussed their opinion
of the article students read for homework about civic responsibility,
and their conversation was intended to be a model. Next, they
reminded students of the seminar’s two rules: (1) There was to be
no verbal communication, and (2) Everyone had to contribute a
thought. With that, the intern typed the seminar’s prompt on the
document’s top line:
What is your opinion about the article’s central
argument? Do students have a responsibility to be engaged citizens
before they are 18, if they can’t vote?
After the prompt was displayed
on both the overhead projector and on the students’ tablets, there
was a pause. I counted in my head, “1, 2, 3, 4…” As I was nearing
five, I heard the first tapping of keys on a tablet – like a small leak
in a dam that would lead to an onrush of water. I saw words begin
to appear under the prompt on the overhead screen. The words
were one student’s response to the prompt. I then heard more
typing and watched as words quickly appeared, or rather flooded,
on the screen. The words were both responses to the prompt
and responses to other students’ responses to the prompt. The
responses rushed onto the screen, and it challenged me to keep
track of them. I flipped my eyes from the overhead screen to the
different students’ tablets. Each student had a different view of the
Google document and was
responding to different
prompts synchronously
(Botzakis, Burns, & Hall,
2014; Duke, 2013). After five
minutes, I heard the pace
of typing slow and then
peter out. The teacher and
intern were both smiling,
and the intern eagerly
said, “So, let’s see what we
have.” Soon, the class began
discussing their different
experiences responding
to the original prompt and
how they responded to
both their classmates and
their classmates’ responses.
Applying the
Checklist
The Silent Seminar required students to use multiple skills
to engage the teacher’s original prompt, their classmates’
responses to the prompt, and their responses to their
classmates’ responses. In this way, the students engaged
higher-order thinking skills in multiple ways, which can
be unpacked using Effective Teaching Traits checklist.
Are students reading and/or communicating texts specific
to the content area?
The students read a content-area text
previous to engaging the Silent Seminar and the comments they
provided were in response to both the text and their classmates’
responses. Their classmates’ responses constitute a content-area
text, and the responses each student wrote are content-area texts
they authored. Students’ responses to both the text and their
classmates’ responses align to disciplinary literacy skills in that
they are reading and communicating in the specific subject area.
Are students using technology to collaborate?
The use
of a Google Drive document in this manner allowed students
to share their thinking via their responses to the original
prompt and each other, which supports their development of
disciplinary literacy. As the document came alive with student
writing, I saw them make connections between comments
and build on each other’s comments to make meaning. In
this way, the students did collaborate using technology.
Will the skill students are using or the task students
are completing transfer to other content areas and/or
their life outside of school?
In this activity, students are
using multiple skills simultaneously to complete the task of
responding to the prompt and their classmates. Students are
using text-analysis skills to form their opinion of the article,
interpersonal analysis skills to interpret the meaning of their
classmates’ responses, and digital literacy skills to read and
interpret an evolving, synchronous text. These skills transfer
over to students’ lives when they read a variety of both print
and digital texts in their academic and personal lives.
Table 2. Checklist of Effective Teaching Traits
Qualifier
Justification of Qualifier
1. Are students reading and/
or communicating texts
specific to the content area?
Each discipline contains texts that are unique
to it, and students must be taught how to
engage the texts as readers and writers of that
discipline (Fang, 2012; Shanahan & Shanahan,
2008).
2. Are students using
technology
to collaborate?
To be part of a globalized community, students
must be able to connect, share, and team with
a variety of individuals (Simonson, Smaldino,
Albright, & Zvacek, 2014; Whitehead, Jensen, &
Boschee, 2014).
3. Will the skill students are
using or the task students
are completing transfer to
other content areas and/or
their life outside of school?
If they are to be meaningful, the abilities
students develop in a classroom must
be applicable and relevant to learning
opportunities that exist in other classrooms
and in their personal/professional lives
(McClanahan, Williams, Kennedy, & Tate, 2012;
Smith, Given, Julien, Ouellette, & DeLong, 2013).
4. Are there high levels of
student engagement?
Students must be interested and see the
value of the learning task in order for it to be
effective and engaging (Ainley & Ainley, 2011;
Christenson, 2012).