Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  57 / 228 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 57 / 228 Next Page
Page Background

Allergen Working Group Topics for Discussion

1. Nature of Analyte

The precise nature of the analyte has not been resolved. Working Group members have discussed

peptides, proteins, and commodities.

Allergens are regulated by the FDA and EU as the whole allergen (i.e., peanuts) and products

thereof.

The draft SMPR specifies mass spectrometry as the analytical technique, and presumably methods

will detect/measure the peaks associated with certain peptides. However, the exact peptide is left

up to the method developer. Methods may differ as to the peptide and fragmentation methods.

Therefore the exact ratio of peptide to whole commodity may differ. It should be left up to the

method develop to: 1) decide which peptide and fragmentation method; and 2) determine the

appropriate conversion factor. The AOAC Expert Review Panel will review the method developer’s

proposed conversion factors as part of the method review.

RECOMMENDATION: PPM OF ALLERGEN PER COMMODITY.

WORKING GROUP DECISION:

AGREED.

2. Commutability

It was suggested that reference materials should be commutable. The term “commutability” was

first used to describe the ability of a reference or control material to have interassay properties

comparable to the properties demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by more

than one analytical method.

Commutability is not an AOAC requirement for evaluation of methods.

While commutability would seem ideal, it may not be practical. A commutable allergen reference

material would require that a reference material provider demonstrate that equivalent results are

obtained using a variety of techniques, or example ELISA. Lateral flow, LC-MS, MALDI-TOF-MS, and

PCR. It would seem unlikely that many, if any, reference materials would be characterized by

multiple techniques, and just as unlikely that equivalent results would be demonstrated.

RECOMMENDATION: DO NOT REQUIRE COMMUTABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS.

WORKING GROUP DECISION:

AGREED.

ADDITIONAL: COATES TO REACH OUT TO DAIRY COMMUNITY TO IDENTIFY ADDITIONAL REFERENCE

MATERIALS USED BY THE INDUSTRY.

5

3. VITAL reference doses

3.1 Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labeling (VITAL) is a project of the Allergen Bureau based in

Australia/New Zealand. There is also an EU-VITAL. VITAL is a voluntary consensus project to

establish maximum levels of allergens for safe consumption by individuals with food allergies.

The maximum allergen concentrations are calculated using the specification provided by the

commenter for a 200 g serving size of food.

serving

size (g)

converted

to kg

mg/kg

hazel nut

200

0.2

3.2

milk

200

0.2

15.2

peanut

200

0.2

4

whole

egg

200

0.2

1.2

As the commenter noted, the maximum permissible concentration of allergens are all below the

proposed LOQ in the SMPR.

While the VITAL concentrations are not binding, they are based on scientific studies.

RECOMMENDATION: LOQ AND RANGES CONSISTENT WITH THE VITAL WOULD SEEM TO BE A

BENEFIT FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE, AND THEREFORE A GOOD REASON TO REVISE THE SMPR.

WORKING GROUP DECISION: VITAL IS NOT AN INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STANDARD.

AGREED NOT REVISE THE SMPR.

3.2 VITAL values are based on amount of protein per service size. Therefore, the definition of the

food allergens as “food commodities” without mentioning the protein content will establish a

non-comparability between results obtained by an LC-MS/MS method and VITAL values.

Method developers can provide conversion factors in their methods for peptide to protein to

“whole” allergen.

RECOMMENDATION: NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED.

WORKING GROUP DECISION: AGREED WITH RECIMMENDATION.

NO CHANGE RECOMMENDED.

6