Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  381 / 1084 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 381 / 1084 Next Page
Page Background

Let’s start with the definition

ICRU 83

:

In earlier ICRU documents, the possibility of

compromising

the

margins of the PTV if they encroached on

OAR

was suggested (ICRU,

1999; 2004; 2007), but is

no longer recommended

. To reduce the

CTV-to-PTV margin has always been a temptation. As an example,

the CTV-to-PTV margin between the prostate and rectum is often 1

cm, except in the anterior – posterior direction for which it is

reduced to spare the rectum

To ensure accurate reporting of absorbed dose to the PTV in cases for

which the PTV encroaches or overlaps another PTV, OAR, or PRV, it

is now recommended that the delineation of the primary PTV

margins should not be compromised. Developments in treatment-

planning software now make it possible to achieve sufficient dose

sparing of the OAR by

using priority rules in optimizer

planning

systems (see Section 2). Alternatively, subdivision of the PTV into

regions with different prescribed absorbed doses (so-called

PTV-subvolumes

, PTVSV) may be used.

The PTV 2017 - D. Verellen