Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  48 / 68 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 48 / 68 Next Page
Page Background

46

Wire & Cable ASIA – May/June 2015

www.read-wca.com

From the Americas

Steel

More trouble for the San Francisco Bay

Bridge: indications of corrosion in one of

some 400 hard-to-access fasteners

“There is no obvious workaround for the rods that anchor

the 525-foot tower to its foundation. They were essentially

fixed in place when the tower was lowered atop them

during construction in 2010.”

San Francisco Chronicle

staff writer Jaxon Van Derbeken

was referring to the 400-plus galvanised steel fasteners

at the base of the eastern-span tower of the bridge that

crosses San Francisco Bay between Oakland and Yerba

Buena Island.

On 20

th

February, Bay Bridge officials said that tests on

a 25-foot-long steel anchor rod removed after being

inadvertently submerged in water for years disclosed

rust and tiny cracks – a potentially worrisome sign for the

long-term viability of the self-anchored suspension bridge.

The rods, which sat in holes at the tower’s foundation that

were poorly grouted, cannot be removed without being

destroyed. And there is not room enough for manoeuvring

replacement rods into position.

Thus any evidence of water damage to the rods presents

Caltrans – the California Department of Transportation

– with what the

Chronicle

said “could be an unsolvable

dilemma.” (“Rust, Cracks Found on Bay Bridge Tower Rod,”

20

th

February)

That makes this latest in a series of construction problems

on the $6.4 billion bridge potentially one of the most

serious. Wrote Mr Van Derbeken: “Other steel rods that

stewed in rainwater for several years snapped when they

were tightened in 2013 on seismic-stability structures on

the bridge, but Caltrans was able to engineer a replacement

for them.”

At a news conference in Oakland to announce the results

of preliminary tests on the removed rod, Caltrans bridge

engineer Brian Maroney said that a plan of action on the

new problem must await further test results.

“I want to know what I’ve got down that hole to make a

good decision,” Mr Maroney said. “We’re still in the process

of the science.”

A corrosion risk: but how great?

The rods are coated in zinc – galvanised – for rust

resistance. But galvanisation can make metal more

vulnerable to another form of corrosion: hydrogen-induced

cracking. The Caltrans tests revealed that the galvanising

layer was gone on parts of the rod, an indication that

hydrogen may have invaded the metal.

Mr Van Derbeken recalled that hydrogen-induced cracking

was implicated in the failure of 32 galvanised rods on the

bridge in 2013.

Officials downplay that risk in the current episode, on

grounds that the tower rods are under less tension than

those in the seismic-stability structures that gave concern

earlier.

In Mr Maroney’s view, the discovery that other rods at

the tower base are cracked and rusted would not present

“a safety issue.” Even if many of the rods were to fail in a

large earthquake, he said, it would inflict extra damage on

the tower – but not catastrophic failure.

Others are less certain. Two independent experts consulted

by the

Chronicle

said that, because tiny cracks like those

found on the tested rod can worsen over time, the tower

rods are at risk of failing even at their lower levels of stress.

“If it started, it will grow,” said Yun Chung, a retired Bechtel

engineer and expert on steel fasteners who has been

critical of Caltrans. “It will continue to grow until reaching a

critical size – then, bang.”

Lisa Fulton, a metallurgical engineer and materials scientist

who specialises in corrosion, told Mr Van Derbeken that the

loss of the zinc galvanisation coating is telltale evidence

of the electrochemical reaction that drives hydrogen from

standing water into high-strength steel. As with the rods

that failed on the span in 2013, the presence of hydrogen

can make the steel vulnerable to failure, Ms Fulton said.

According to the account in the

Chronicle

, Caltrans said

many of the rods sat in only a few inches of moisture;

but 60 or so were entirely submerged in water that got

into the tower during storms and power-washings.

Engineers cut apart and removed two of those for

testing.

The first rod was tested only for its material properties.

The second rod to be removed was tested more

extensively and showed rust and cracking.

Caltrans officials have said that the main bridge

contractor, Oakland-based American Bridge/Fluor

Enterprises, did not follow specifications that called for

the sleeves surrounding the tower rods to be filled with

moisture-resistant grout. The company – a joint venture

of American Bridge Co (Coraopolis, Pennsylvania) and

Fluor Corp (Irving, Texas) – is removing standing water

from the sleeves and putting in new grout.

Energy

Their revenue squeezed by slowing

growth in demand for electricity,

USA utilities eye the electric vehicle

charging business

Since their commercial introduction some five years ago,

electric vehicles have failed to significantly penetrate the

US mass market; largely, experts say, because an adequate

network of public charging stations has not been built. But

now, according to

New York Times

energy reporter Diane

Cardwell, that could change – if major electric utilities have

their way.

BigStockPhoto.com Photographer: Aispl