Previous Page  131 / 264 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 131 / 264 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY-AUGUST 1978.

Under Section 31 a Floating Chattel Mortgage is

converted into a Specific Chattel Mortgage where the

principal money secured remains unpaid for 28 days after

the appointed date or interest is in arrears for 56 days

after becoming due. The Mortgagee must:—

1. Serve on the Mortgagor notice in writing that the

Floating Charge has become fixed.

2. The Mortgagor must take an inventory of the stock

then on the lands to which the floating Chattel relates.

3. Within 7 days after the day on which the notice is

served the Mortgagee must send to the Circuit Court

office by registered post a true copy of the Notice and a

true copy of the inventory.

Once these conditions have been complied with from

then on the Floating Chattel Mortgage shall have the

same effect as the Specific Chattel Mortgage.

Section 33 of the Act deals with the effect of the

Chattel Mortgage on Execution Orders.

Section 34 states that the Chattel Mortgage shall have

priority in accordance with the times in which it is

registered under the Act.

Charges on Land In Favour of the Corporation

Part 4 of the Act deals with Charges on land in favour

of the Agricultural Credit Corporation. A Charge

includes a mortgage or any other means by which land is

charged for the payment of money.

Registered Land

This Charge created by Part 4 of the Act will rank in

priority over equitable claims against registered land or

equities which arise where the owner is not an absolute

owner. The Priority is created by Section 39 of the Act

which states that where a Charge in favour of the

Corporation for the repayment of a loan is registered as

burden effecting registered land then the Charge and the

costs and expenses of all legal proceedings relating to the

charge shall as against the land be in priority to and shall

override any equitable claim against die lands. However,

under Section 39(2) does not apply where a person

claiming to be entitled to an equitable claim against the

lands registered a caution under Section 97 of the

Registration of Title Act, 1964 at the time of the priority

charge. Neither shall it operate where the total amount of

the charge exceeds £25,000.

Under Section 40 a priority charge on registered land

which is not a permanent improvement charge on the

land shall as between the Mortgagor Equitable'claimant

bedeems to be charged on all the land to which the

Mortgagor is beneficially entitled.

Under Section 40 Subsection (2) money paid to the

Corporation by or out of the share in the estate or interest

of an Equitable claimant on foot of a priority charge on

registered lands which is not a permanent improvement

charge on the land shall be repaid to the equitable

claimant by the Mortgagor and shall be considered a debt

due by the Mortgagor to the equitable claimant and shall

be treated as such.

Section 41 gives special protection to minors and

persons of unsound mind.

Under Sections 42, 43 and 44 exactly similar

principals are enacted in relation to charges in favour of

the corporation on unregistered lands.

Sections 47 to 53 deal with miscellaneous provisions in

relation to Charges on land.

Section '53 provides for the exemption from stamp duty

and fee of such charges.

Chargeable Order

This part of the act is the most far reaching and

progressive and controversial section of the act.

Where the Agricultural Credit Corporation opposes to

lend money for improving land to a registered owner or

a

person in occupation of registered land

the provisions of

Section 54 apply.

The ACC may make an order charging the land with

payment of the money and the Chargeable Order under the

Section shall operate to charge the money and interest

thereon on the lands to which the Order relates from the

date of the Order or the date from which the money is lent

whichever is the later. Where the order is made it shall be

registered as a burden effecting the lands.

Section 55 provides that a Charge created under this

part of the Act shall be deemed to be a mortgage made by

Deed within the meaning of the Conveyancing Acts 1881

to 1911 and the Corporation shall be the Mortgagee for

the purposes of those acts and accordingly should have all

the powers conferred by those Acts on Mortgages under

mortgages made by Deed and a Charge created under

this part of the Act shall when registered be deemed to be

a registered charge within the meaning of the Registration

of Title Act 1964 and the lands to which the charge

relates shall be deemed, for the purpose of Section 39, to

have been charged by the registered owner thereof in

favour of the Corporation with the repayment of the

amount of the charge and interest.

Section 56 provides that all money payable on foot of

the Charge created by Section 54 shall be recoverable

from the person who is the registered owner of the lands

as a personal liability.

However, under Section 56 (B) a subsequent registered

owner could recover the money as a personal debt from

the previous registered owner who had benefited from

the loan.

Section 56 Subsection 2 provides that the money can

also be recovered from a person in occupation of the

lands. (Other than the registered owner of the lands).

However, under Section 56 Subsection 2 paragraph B a

subsequent person in occupation of the lands can claim

the money as a personal debt from the previous occupier

of the land who had benefited from the loan.

Section 57 of the act deals with the conditions and

variations of the Charging Order.

Section 58 of the act deals with the cancellation of

Charges.

This concludes my report on the above Act which I

hope will be of benefit to the reader.

A BLOW FOR THE RESTRICTIVE

PRACTICES COMMISSION

June Issue, 1978.

The following omission and mistake were

respectively made in the publication of this

article:

1. An appeal is being taken from the

judgment of Mr. Justice McWilliam in the

High Court; and

2. The report, attributed to the Restrictive

Practices Commission was, in fact, a report

produced by the Examiner of Restrictive

Practices.

The Editor.

131