GAZETTE
SEPTEMBER 1978,
(k) Appeal to Court of Second Instance
(1) Further Appeals and Issue of Decree of Nullity
(m)Conditions attached to Decree of Nullity
(n) Rejection of the Petition
(o) Informal or Administrative Procedure.
6. Dispensation of a Non-Consummated Marriage
(i) General
(ii) Proof of Non-Consummation
(iii) Procedure for Obtaining Evidence
(iv) Comments on Evidence and Transmission to
Rome
(v) Procedure in Rome
(vi) Restrictive Clauses
7. Dissolution of The Natural Bond
(i) Power of Pope to Dissolve Non-Sacramental
Marriages
(ii) Requirements for Petition for Dissolution
(iii) Proof of Non-Baptism
(iv) Comments on Evidence and Transmission to
Rome
(v) Discretion of Pope whether to Grant
Dissolution.
Marriage Annulment in
the Catholic Church
1. General Summary
(a)
The Scope of Marriage Tribunal Work:
There is
either a marriage tribunal for each diocese or
alternatively, and more commonly nowadays, tribunals
arranged on a regional basis covering a number of
dioceses in a geographical area. In Ireland, there are four
regional marriage tribunals, one based in Dublin for the
Archdiocese of Dublin and the Dioceses of Meath,
Kildare and Ossory, and Ferns; and others centred in
Cork, Galway and Armagh. The sphere of action for the
tribunal is fairly restricted, that is restricted within the
confines of what the Roman Catholic Church (herein
generally referred to as "the Church") believes marriage
to be — essentially a union which is indissoluble,
provided it is valid, sacramental and consummated. In
considering the work of a marriage tribunal, one
considers two aspects, firstly, the procedure which must
be adopted in the examination of the marriage, its
circumstances and the parties to it and, secondly, the law
which constitutes the criteria for that examination.
Essentially, the law is contained in the Code of Canon
Law (1918), but a vast part of the ramifications of what is
briefly contained in the Code is contained in another
source — namely the jurisprudence of the Church's
courts, which is a product of case after case in which the
law is explained and refined and developed, leading to a
greater understanding of what constitutes marriage and,
especially, what creates a bar to a union being a valid
marriage.
(b)
General Principles:
Part of the Church's teaching
of marriage is that a valid, sacramental and consummated
union is indissoluble. This means that two baptised
persons who were married in accordance with the law,
and whose union has been consummated are bound in an
indissoluble union sanctified by God until the death of one
of the partners. This applies equally to Roman Catholics
(herein generally referred to as "Catholics") and non-
Catholics but an additional law to which Catholics must
conform is the rule that, without a general or special
dispensation, those baptised in the Church must be
married before a priest and two witnesses; this rule is
termed the "form" of marriage. It is not correct to state
that the Church does not recognise a marriage which
takes place between two non-Catholics in a marriage
136
register office, because apart from the case of Catholics
who are bound to the form of marriage (i.e. before a priest
and two witnesses) a marriage can (canonically) take
place anywhere. The Church teaches that what makes the
marriage is the consent of the partners and assuming
consent has been given by both the parties to a marriage
the union is valid; and, assuming that the same union is
also sacramental and consummated, it is indissoluble.
Therefore, the three elements of an indissoluble union in
Church law are (i) validity, (ii) sacramentality, and (iii)
consummation. Die work of a marriage tribunal centres
around the determination of these three elements.
(c)
Validity:
The validity of a marriage depends on the
consent of both parties to the marriage. This consent
must be an irrevocable personal consent given by the two
parties to the union involving a relationship between them
which is lasting and permanent, which in no way excludes
the possibility of children and which imposes the mutual
obligation of total fidelity of one party to the other.
Therefore, what a couple consent to when they exchange
their promises in marriage are (i) the permanence of the
bond, (ii) the right to children within the union, and (iii)
the total fidelity imposed on the couple as a result of the
other two essentials. These three points are made very
clearly in the Pastoral Constitution of the Second Vatican
Council,
The Church in the Modern World.
If any of
these three essentials are lacking at the time of the
marriage ceremony the marriage would not be valid since
the persons concerned had not "consented to Christian
marriage". Also if one of the parties at the time of the
marriage ceremony was insane which prevented him from
giving proper consent to a marriage, then the union for
that reason would be null and void; similarly, if the
marriage was entered into as a result of force exerted or
fear induced on one or other of the parties.
All these elements, namely, the complete lack of
consent to a Christian marriage, the exclusion of the
permanence of marriage, the exclusion of the right to
children, the exclusion of fidelity, the inability to consent,
and consent obtained as a result of great pressure, are all
matters which are the subject of detailed examination in
any nullity proceedings in a marriage tribunal.
Also, the tribunal would have to give consideration to
the question of impediments to the contracting of a




