Previous Page  24 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

24

The UNEP methodology 'Sustainable Assessment of Technology'

4

(SAT) provides guidance on how to identify and select the

best possible technology options, through an informed and

participatory decision making process. The SAT Methodology

can be adapted to country-specific needs and parameters. It

integrates social, economic and environmental considerations.

Effects of altitude on solid waste and its

management

The types of waste management at high altitudes are influenced

by climatic and atmospheric conditions and soil characteristics,

particularly the scheduling of street sweeping and collection

services, the types of refuse collection vehicles used and the

application of biological treatment of organic of waste.

The slower rate of decomposition and fermentation in weather

conditions associated with high altitudes reduces the impact

of waste on public health, the environment and aesthetics in

mountain cities, particularly where there are deficiencies in

urban cleaning services. Vector-borne diseases are more limited

in number and variety, odour generation is not as immediate as

in cities with warmer climates and the generation of leachate is

relatively more controllable than in other cities at lower altitudes,

because levels of rainfall are generally lower.

These conditions allow private or public operators to collect waste

less frequently with a consequent reduction in collection costs,

because inhabitants can store waste for longer in their homes. This

also means that community containers can be used to store waste in

densely populated residential areas – depending on the frequency

of collection services (Scheinberg,Wilson and Rodic-Wiersma, 2010).

On the other hand, biological decomposition processes

differ at higher altitudes. Lower temperatures can affect the

decomposition of organic matter in composting processes

(Cooperband, 2002). Despite this, biological treatment of

organic solid waste (including composting or vermiculture) is

still an option in some mountain cities (Coffey and Coad, 2010),

providing care is taken to maintain temperatures suitable for the

microorganisms responsible for generating compost or humus

(which can then be used as a soil enricher).

HIGH INCOME

UPPER MIDDLE INCOME

LOWER MIDDLE INCOME

LOW INCOME

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

kg/capita/day

AVERAGE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE GENERATION

- ACCORDING TO COUNTRY INCOME LEVEL, 2010

AVERAGE MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION EFFICENCY

- ACCORDING TO COUNTRY INCOME LEVEL, 2010

HIGH INCOME

UPPER MIDDLE INCOME

LOWER MIDDLE INCOME

LOW INCOME

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

%

Source: Hoornweg D. & Bhada-Tata P. (2012)

What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management

, World Bank.

L

O

W

I

N

C

O

M

E

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

S

H

I

G

H

I

N

C

O

M

E

C

O

U

N

T

R

I

E

S

53%

ORGANIC WASTE

34%

28%

OTHER WASTE TYPES

19%

2%

METALS

5%

2%

TEXTILES

1%

2%

GLASS

6%

7%

PLASTIC

11%

6%

PAPER

24%

%

%

LOW INCOME

COUNTRIES

vs.

HIGH INCOME

COUNTRIES

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

COMPOSITION

Source: UNEP & ISWA (2015)

Global Waste Management Outlook

.