Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  271 / 350 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 271 / 350 Next Page
Page Background

THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN THE WCITǧ12

for Asia and the Pacific, due to its high diversity) had common views throughout

the process on many issues. The European region works under the umbrella of the

European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT)

in the Committee called Com-ITU. The CEPT consists of 48 Member States, where

the EU/27 form the basis – but there are others, like Turkey and countries that

are also members of the CIS, headed by the Russian Federation. The preparatory

process started in October 2010 and finished in June 2012. Nevertheless, regional

organizations, ITU Sector Members and Member States had an opportunity to

submit further contributions; so there was no clear picture on how the proposal of

amended or a new ITRs would look like until the start of the WCIT-12.

The Czech Republic’s participation in the preparatory process

The Czech Republic was actively involved in the preparatory process right from

the beginning, especially through the CEPT sessions. Due to a number of proposals

aiming only at particular and/or regional interests, the CEPT countries elaborated

principles for negotiation:

Criterion 1:

As an International Treaty, the ITRs should address high level strategic

and policy issues.

Criterion 2:

Consistency with the ITU Constitution, in particular its Preamble and

Article 1.

Criterion 3:

Consistency with International agreements / legislation adopted by

CEPT members.

Criterion 4:

Exclusion of Areas related to Member States’ application of legal or

policy principles which are within their sovereign rights.

Criterion 5

: Exclusion of areas not related to the Purpose and Scope of the ITRs.

1

All these were of a great importance during the whole process. Some other

regions and single states were of a similar view.

Already during the preparatory process,views over major questions were diversified.

The European countries, supported by some others, wanted to stick to the original

range of ITRs, not intending to enlarge their scope. Other countries, namely the

Russian Federation and other CIS countries, the Arab region, many of the African

countries, and the Asian countries, headed by China, advocated the opposite view

while bringing ICT, Internet and its governance and security to the table. All matters

had been discussed and dealt with in the ITU for a long period of time; it might

have therefore seemed logical to include them in the ITRs. The main concern that

the Western countries, including the Czech Republic, repeatedly pointed out was

that these topics are already covered by other international organizations, including

the UN and its agencies, within their respective scopes. The ITU, as a specialised

UN agency for telecommunications and as telecommunications is defined as “Any

1

For details see Document No. 16, dated 12 October 2012 – European Common Proposals for the

Work of the Conference –

http://www.itu.int/md/meetingdoc.asp?lang=en&parent=S12-WCIT12

-

121203-C&PageLB=50.