Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  31 / 154 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 154 Next Page
Page Background

Reviewer Name:

Yang Zhou

Email:

yangzhou@eurofinsus.com

Organization:

Eurofins

General Information

Method Reviewed:

LUT‐01

Method Title:

QUANTITATIVE MEASURMENT OF BETA‐CRYPTOXANTHIN IN PAPRIKA OLEORESIN,  

EXTRACT AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS (BEADLETS)

Applicable SMPR

2016.004

Summary of Method:

Based on the sample matrix (paprika oleoresin, extract, or dietary supplement) and 

I.  Summary

detection instrumentation (HPLC or UV), samples are extracted with corresponding 

extraction solvent. Saponification is performed for paprika oleoresin. The extraction 

solvent is then quantified by HPLC or UV reading.

1.  Does the Applicability of the 

Method Support the Applicability 

of the SMPR?  If not, please explain 

No. This method didn't demonstrate its capability to separate and quantify beta‐

cryptoxanthin isomers, lutein and zeaxanthin.

II.  Review of the Method Only

what is missing.

2.  Does the analytical technique(s) 

used in the method meet the 

SMPR?  If not, please specify how it 

differs from what is stated in the 

SMPR.

Yes

3.  Are the definitions specified in 

the SMPR used and applied 

appropriatly in the method?  If no, 

please indicate how the terms are 

used.

No. In this method, it specified dietary supplements in beadlets form.

4.  Does the method, as written, 

contain all appropriate precautions 

and warnings related to the 

No. Suggested wording: In this method, various organic solvents (hexanes, 

chloroform, etc.,) along with several other hazardous chemicals are used and special 

care should be taken when handling or disposing of these chemicals. Wear gloves, 

method's regaents, components, 

instrumentation, or method steps 

that may be hazardous?  If no, 

please suggest wording or 

option(s).

safety glasses and use in a fume hood. Follow all laboratory safety precautions. Refer 

to Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for any questions relating to any chemicals in use.

1.  Are the definitions specified in 

No. Reproducibility was replaced by word "ruggedness", which is a completely 

III.  Review of Information in Support of the Method

the SMPR used and applied 

appropriately in the supporting 

documentation (manuscripts, 

method studies, etc…)?  If not, 

please explain the differences and 

if the method is impacted by the 

difference.  

different property of a method.