Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  50 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

49

JCPSLP

Volume 18, Number 1 2016

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

10 Whole school planning

The preventative approach of targeting the entire school

population (often a year level at a time) provides positive

outcomes for students with identified speech, language,

and learning issues. It makes oral language a living part of

the curriculum and allows teachers to plan for the explicit

teaching of oral language skills. When the speech

pathologist plans with teachers or teams of teachers, the

interventions provided reach all students who require extra

support with oral language development. While the

curriculum (AusVELS, accessible via

ausvels.vcaa.vic.edu

.

au) provides teachers with information about the

expectations for each level regarding students’ speaking

and listening, often this information only “comes alive”with

the assistance of a speech pathologist. This type of

planning allows for more accurate assessment, teaching

and reporting of oral language.

References

Dodd, B., Holm, A., Oerlemans, M., & McCormack, M.

(1996). Queensland University inventory of literacy. St Lucia,

Qld: Department of Speech Pathology & Audiology,

University of Queensland.

Neilson, R. (2003). Sutherland phonological awareness

test – revised (SPAT-R). Jamberoo, NSW: Language,

Speech and Literacy Services.

Renfrew, C. (2003). The action picture test (4th ed.).

Oxford, UK: Speechmark Publishing Ltd.

Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. (2006). Clinical

evaluation of language fundamentals – Australian

standardised edition (4th ed.). London: Psychological

Corporation.

clients. The presence of a history of speech pathology

intervention prior to school entry and information about the

therapy that has been completed can help professionals

form an opinion on the individual’s prognosis. The referral

facilitates multidisciplinary work with the student, which

ensures that the team focuses upon the student as a whole

person, rather than on their difficulties with speech,

language, and learning only.

8 The use of evidence-based practice

As a team, we regularly meet and discuss areas of interest

with a focus on the most recent evidence base for the

assessment or treatment of a particular disorder. This has

proven to be an invaluable way of maintaining professional

knowledge and thus, has provided higher quality

therapeutic interventions. Utilising evidence-based

interventions that have been shown to be effective with

different client groups may ultimately lead to a more

favourable prognosis for students due to their positive

influence on outcomes.

9 Concrete materials

I may sound old fashioned, but I like to use real games and

activities rather than tablet/iPad apps and games for

interventions for several reasons. As many of the students

we work with already have too much screen time, I find that

real games and items are often more engaging and the

therapy session is more effective. Games such as “Guess

Who”, “Baffle Gab”, favourite “Disney” cards and “Super

Duper Fun Decks” are just some of the resources I use.

Parents will often have the same games at home which can

be used for follow up. I do use tablet/iPad games at the

end of sessions as reinforcement (with games that focus on

our goals), but I am confident that the use of both types of

resource is beneficial. “Guess Who” board game available

from

www.bigw.com.au,

$29.00; “Baffle Gab” available

from

www.fishpond.com.au

, $59.97; various “Super Duper

Fun Decks” available from

www.brainstormed.com.au,

from

$15.00.

Correspondence to:

Wendy-Mae Rapson

Speech pathologist

Department of Education and Training, Melbourne, Vic.

email:

rapson.wendymae.l@edumail.vic.gov.au