Previous Page  28 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 28 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

Supporting social, emotional and mental health and well-being: Roles of speech-language pathologists

142

JCPSLP

Volume 19, Number 3 2017

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

KEYWORDS

AUGMENTATIVE

AND ALTERNATIVE

COMMUNICATION

COMPLEX

PHYSICAL,

COGNITIVE, AND

SENSORY NEEDS

PARTNER

ASSISTED

SCANNING

THIS ARTICLE

HAS BEEN

PEER-

REVIEWED

Helen Bayldon

(top) and Sally

Clendon

Partner assisted

scanning

Enable the unexpected

Helen Bayldon and Sally Clendon

discussed. Clinical implications for those working with

individuals with CPCSN, including considerations for

the design of the vocabulary set, the choice of selection

method, and training for communication partners in how

to provide an environment that supports aided language

development, are presented.

What is partner assisted scanning?

Communication is a complex process that involves four

observable components. People take turns being receivers

(listeners) and senders (speakers) of information (the

message) via a means of communication (e.g., speech,

writing, gesture, sign, accessing a communication device)

(Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013; Burkhart & Porter, 2006;

Light, Beukelman & Reichle, 2003). The information

component starts with the sender’s intent, and requires the

coordination of attention and a sophisticated set of motor

movements to access the means of communication and

thereby relay the intent to the receiver.

When individuals with developmental or acquired

disabilities cannot use typical motor movements to speak,

write, gesture or sign, they may use aided language

strategies as a means of communication to relay their

messages. Aided language includes the use of pictures,

objects, photos, written words or braille to represent

words, phrases or concepts. The bank of symbols that

are available is called the vocabulary set and this may be

organised into an AAC system such as a communication

book or device, or taken from the context or environment

and offered as a list (Burkhart, 2016). The items selected

for a particular individual need to reflect his or her

communication needs, which are dependent on age,

cultural background and environment (Light & McNaughton,

2014).

Individuals who use AAC indicate their choice via direct

selection or indirect selection through scanning. Direct

selection involves touching or pointing (for example, with

a finger, head tracker, eye pointing [including eye gaze

technologies], or optical pointer) at the desired item and

is the simplest and most “direct” method for making a

selection (Treviranus & Roberts, 2003). Direct selection is

often the first choice for access to an AAC system, as it is

operationally simple and more efficient. However, for some

people with significant motor impairments that inhibit or

compromise direct selection, indirect selection via scanning

(switch or partner assisted) is a viable option (Dropik &

Partner assisted scanning (PAS) is a strategy

used with people who have complex physical,

cognitive, and sensory needs (CPCSN) to

enable expressive communication and

facilitate language learning. This paper

describes how and why PAS may work for

individuals with CPCSN. It outlines some of

the barriers to augmentative and alternative

communication (AAC) intervention for

individuals with CPCSN who may use PAS.

Finally, the paper presents factors to consider

when implementing AAC with PAS, including

considerations for the design of AAC systems

with reference to research findings and

advice from clinical experts.

I

n the past few years, partner assisted scanning has

become more widely used as an access method,

however, it is still not well understood by speech-

language pathologists, or others, who support individuals

with complex physical, cognitive, and sensory needs

(CPCSN) (Nevers, 2016). There is very little literature that

describes PAS as an intervention strategy, and thus,

limited discussion of its efficacy. However, several clinical

experts (e.g., Burkhart, 2016; Farrall, 2015; Porter, 2012;

and Zangari, 2016) have suggested that when combined

with a robust augmentative and alternative communication

(AAC) system, PAS is a strategy that supports language

learning and communication in children with complex

communication needs and multiple challenges.

The number of individuals with CPCSN is relatively small

in New Zealand. In 2015, approximately 1.1% of the total

school population received Ongoing Resource Scheme

(ORS) funding, which provides the very highest level of

support for students needing special education. Of those

8,525 students, nearly a quarter (2005, or 23%) received

very high ORS. These are the students with the most

complex physical, vision, hearing, language or learning

needs (Education Counts, 2016), and for whom PAS may

be a useful strategy to access communication.

In this paper, the authors describe the key aspects of

PAS and the rationale for using this strategy. Some of

the barriers that inhibit AAC intervention with individuals

with CPCSN, and how PAS may offer a solution, are also