Previous Page  25 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 64 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 19, Number 3 2017

139

children, matched by the skills of experienced teachers.

Parents spoke frequently of the importance of providing

their children with a strong foundation for starting school,

and doing so in a way that was age appropriate, but at the

same time accounting for their children’s learning needs.

To this end, they said they valued the proactive approach

in the PrEPIC program, whereby their children could begin

the transition to school early via the program, thus reducing

the likelihood of having to repeat either a year of preschool

or the prep year. In working with teachers, parents spoke

of the importance of open communication and how they

appreciated staff having a sense of humour when it came

to managing their children’s behaviours.

The second theme –

Seems grown up

– emerged

in response to the large number of parent comments

regarding the perceived impact of the program on their

children’s development. Ella summarised: “PrEPIC [has

been] brilliant so far. He absolutely loves it. He seems grown

up. He’s just, like, not a baby any more.” Parents observed

positive changes in their children’s social-communication

skills and behaviour. As illustrated in Table 2, some

parents spoke of improvements in expressive language,

with children learning to share information about their day

and becoming more skilled and interested in interacting

with the other children. Others focused on changes in

their children’s emotional regulation and behaviour, and

the positive impact of these new skills on their children’s

learning. Collectively, the parents expressed a strong

sentiment that the children were more mature, confident,

and prepared for their transition to school.

The final theme –

Eased us and the kids into school

accounted for the unanimous sentiment from parents that

the transition to school would be easier for both them,

and their children, following the program. The theme label

originated from Aisha’s comment that:

It’s kind of eased us, well, eased us and the kids into

primary school because it is doing PrEPIC but it is like

a primary school, so it’s a lot easier for the children

and also for the parents too.

Parents explained that their anxiety decreased while their

children were in the program, primarily due to changes in

their children’s skills and the support provided by teachers

and other parents. Several parents reported that the

positive changes in their children’s skills and behaviour

meant that they now had more schooling options to choose

from for the following year, with mainstream schooling

(as opposed to special education) seeming like a viable

option. Notably, parents also explained that changes in the

children’s skills and behaviour had led to positive changes

at home, further reducing pressure on families during

the transition. In spite of these reported benefits, several

parents still expressed trepidation regarding the transition

from PrEPIC to the first year of school, suggesting that

some anxiety is possibly unavoidable even when a range of

supports is put in place.

Discussion

Despite widespread acknowledgement in research and

clinical settings of the importance and challenges of

transition to school, few studies have examined community-

based attempts to support children and their parents during

this process. Accordingly, the results of this study provide

novel insights into the possible impacts that a

comprehensive program targeting transition may have on

children and their parents. Here, we consider the key

(including communication skills) were not available for

inclusion in the participant description. Pseudonyms have

been provided to all children and parents for privacy reasons.

Procedure

The focus group for parents whose children had completed

PrEPIC (Group 1) was held in the evening in a meeting

room at a university and lasted approximately 75 minutes.

For Group 2, focus groups were held on two different

occasions during the day in an empty classroom in the

school and lasted approximately 90 minutes and 30

minutes respectively. The first author facilitated the focus

groups using a semi-structured question guide (available on

request) that encouraged the parents to reflect on, and

share, their experiences of the program. Parents were

asked to reflect on their children’s skills, expectations for

the program, and perceived outcomes. The use of the

semi-structured question guide, along with the fact that the

participants were familiar with one another, created what

appeared to be a relaxed atmosphere, helping to ensure

that all contributed to the discussion. They frequently

acknowledged one another’s comments in a supportive

manner through body language and their own comments.

All focus groups were audio recorded to assist with

transcription and analysis.

Coding and analysis

The authors and research assistants first transcribed the

audio-recordings verbatim. The first and second author

then reviewed the transcripts while listening to the

recordings to check for transcription accuracy. The

transcripts formed the basis of a thematic analysis

completed according to the procedure described by Braun

and Clarke (2006). Specifically, the first author read each

transcript to ensure familiarity with the contents. Next, using

line-by-line analysis, preliminary codes were assigned to

identify discrete ideas, incidents, and events in the data.

Similar and related codes were subsequently grouped into

categories, from which abstract themes emerged. Each

theme was reviewed with reference to the original

transcriptions to determine the extent to which it accounted

for the participants’ views and experiences.

The second author reviewed all transcripts and the first

author’s analysis to identify any differences of interpretation

in the coding that were resolved through discussion and

consensus coding as necessary. Guidelines for ensuring

credibility developed by Chiviotti and Piran (2003) were

adhered to, including specifying the aims of the research,

the basis on which participants were selected, how the

literature relates to the themes identified, and, where

possible, using the participants’ own words when creating

themes and presenting the results.

Results

Three themes emerged to account for the parents’ views

and experiences of the PrEPIC program. Here, we provide

an overview of each theme, while Table 2 presents a

selection of participant quotes illustrating the constituent

categories for each theme.

The first theme to emerge –

It’s the foundation

– captured

the fact that the transition program was comprised of

multiple components that came together in a cohesive

manner to support the parents. As Ava explained, “It’s the

foundation, in one word, really. It’s the foundation to what’s

ahead.” As is evident in Table 2, the components included

parents having a strong commitment to education for their