Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 64 Next Page
Page Background

136

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 3 2015

Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology

It is also understood and accepted that typically

developing children experiment and play with language

in order to refine their language use (Cress & Marvin,

2003). Therefore, children with CCN must have access

to comprehensive AAC systems in order to have the

same opportunities for language play and exploration

(Burkhart, 2008; Porter, 2012). Without AAC systems

in place, children with CCN have limited capacity to

demonstrate their ability and understanding (Romski &

Sevcik, 2005). A person’s ability to communicate is strongly

linked to cognitive development and also to their ability to

demonstrate knowledge (Romski & Sevcik, 2005), making

it essential for children with CCN to have access to AAC

systems early on so they can experience these language

learning opportunities.

It is necessary to point out that while prerequisite skills

do not exist

before

AAC systems can be implemented,

foundation interaction skills do need to be addressed

during EI. These skills support all communication

interactions, including the use of AAC. They include the

development of cause and effect, joint attention, intentional

behaviours, shared enjoyment, and receptive language

skills (Blackstone, 1999). Experts interviewed on this topic

reported placing particular emphasis on making interactions

engaging for children, using a range of AAC tools

concurrently, and focusing their interventions on the use of

core vocabulary (Blackstone, 1999).

For some children, concurrent operational skill

development also needs to take place in order to enable

functional and independent long-term use of AAC

systems. For example, those with motor impairments

may need exposure to switch skill development in order

to compensate for their physical disabilities. A review of

studies focusing on technology use with infants and young

children between 1980 and 2004 revealed 12 studies

that demonstrated strong evidence for teaching switch

activation successfully to children under 1 year of age with

a variety of diagnoses and cognitive abilities (Campbell,

Milbourne, Dugan, & Wilcox, 2006).

Guidelines for AAC intervention

The following section provides suggestions for where to

start with AAC intervention for children under 5 of age.

1. Follow language progression models

of typically developing children by

targeting appropriate language levels

within intervention.

As discussed above, the language development of typically

developing children is supported by a significant amount of

receptive language input, accompanied by adult support

within the child’s zone of proximal development.

Opportunities to use, explore and play with language are

reinforced by communication partners attributing meaning

to children’s communication attempts. For children requiring

AAC, it is essential that these same foundations and

opportunities are provided, and that we use models of

typical language progression to guide intervention

(Burkhart, 2008; Cress & Marvin, 2003; Light & Drager,

2007; Porter, 2012; Van Tatenhove, 1987).

2. Focus on highly motivating

interactions to teach the power of

communication.

Implementing AAC in the context of highly motivating

interactions is critical (Blackstone, 1999; Burkhart, 2008;

demands relating to their children’s disabilities, as well

as feelings relating to grief and loss (Marshell & Goldbart,

2008). These pressures may influence their capacity to

engage with their child’s AAC intervention. Marshall and

Goldbart (2008, p. 95) explained that:

parents vary in how much and at what point(s) they

prioritize communication over other issues, how

involved and how ‘expert’ they want to be. They

experience the insufficiency of time which makes it

difficult to achieve all that they would like to and they

may feel frustrated and guilty about their children’s

difficulties and what they are able to offer them .

Professionals must acknowledge these factors and tailor

their expectations and approaches to align with individual

families’ priorities and needs (Marshall & Goldbart, 2008).

Communicative functions

All too often caregivers and teams become focused on the

communication of basic wants and needs such as

mealtimes and toileting. While these types of messages are

highly important, it is critical for children with CCN to be

introduced to a wide range of communicative functions

(Cress & Marvin, 2003; Light & McNaughton, 2014; Van

Tatenhove, 1987), for example, commenting, arguing,

requesting, protesting, greeting, asking questions, initiating,

and many more. Intervention focusing on core vocabulary

development not only provides the user with

communicative power, but also ensures the modelling and

use of a range of communicative functions.

Prerequisites for AAC use

An important myth to dispel is the presumption that a set of

prerequisites must be met before AAC intervention can

commence. For example, it was previously thought that

children needed to demonstrate understanding through a

hierarchy of symbol representation methods from real

objects to photos before moving onto line drawings.

However, Romski and Sevcik (2005) argued that no such

hierarchy exists. Their assertion was backed up by research

with typically developing children across three

developmental stages (6, 9 and 12 months) which found no

significant differences between or across participant

responses to photos versus PCS symbols for choice

making (Da Fonte & Taber-Doughty, 2010).

Another misconception is that the child must

demonstrate a certain level of cognitive skill before AAC is

introduced. This assumption is dangerous as we do not

approach language acquisition with typically developing

children in this manner. Rather, we understand that we

must speak to them for at least 12 months before they

are likely to speak their first word back to us. Furthermore,

we speak to them using many more words than they can

say to us at any given time, while concurrently reducing

the complexity of our language, enabling us to operate

within their zone of proximal development (what the child

is able to achieve and learn with the support of an adult;

Vygotsky, 1978). This process of feeding language in before

expecting output highlights the two key components of

language acquisition and use, which are, receptive (what

one understands) and expressive (what one is able to

communicate). For all people learning language at any

stage of life, language must be absorbed receptively before

it will be expressed. For users of AAC, this process can

be replicated through the use of their AAC system by their

communication partners (Goossens, 1989; Porter, 2012).