Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  27 / 64 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 27 / 64 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 3 2015

137

4. Start early and consider a range of

communication options including high-

tech AAC.

Children’s neurological development particularly between 0

and 3 years of age is primed for language development

making it imperative to start early and aim high with

intervention (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013; Light & Drager,

2007; Porter, 2012). A review of studies between 1982 and

2007 found seven conclusive studies (totalling 135

participants) on the use of AAC with children under 3 years

of age (Branson & Demchak, 2009). These included five

single-subject studies and two group designs. They found

that unaided and aided AAC systems could be used

effectively with children under 3 years old. Only two of the

studies compared the effectiveness of different types of

AAC systems, with data indicating that aided AAC systems

may be more effective than unaided systems (Branson &

Demchak, 2009).

Janice Light and Kathy Drager carried out longitudinal

research examining the effects of AAC intervention with nine

children under the age of 5 (Light, 2005). Their intervention

strategy involved weekly hour-long sessions that involved:

1) identifying suitable communication contexts; 2)

developing suitable AAC tools that appealed to the child; 3)

coaching the parent to act as the communication facilitator;

4) ensuring communication occurred across all activities,

and 5) monitoring and evaluating their results. Their findings

indicated that all children had improved rates of turn-

taking; they were able to sustain interactions longer; AAC

systems were used for play and learning, and to facilitate

peer interactions; and the participants acquired a range

of semantic concepts (Light, 2005). All participants were

able to start using visual scene displays (whereby words

and phrases were embedded within a picture of a specific

context, e.g., mum and child talking on a toy phone), before

progressing onto hybrid setups (a combination of a visual

scene display and grid buttons containing words and/or

phrases), and eventually onto traditional grid displays (Light,

2005).

5. Work on skill development

concurrently.

Basic interaction skills, alongside interventions targeting all

areas of communicative competence are imperative for

long-term success (Blackstone, 1999; Campbell et al.,

2006; Light & McNaughton, 2014). Research has

demonstrated that it is possible for children under 1 year of

age to develop switching skills (Campbell et al., 2006).

Linda Burkhart has discussed how to approach skill

development in this area which she terms the “juggling act”

(for more detailed information, please see: http://www.

lburkhart.com/handouts/stepping_stones_chart_10_12.

pdf). Burkhart points out the importance of balancing

increasing demands in one area (such as the physical

movement required to activate a switch) with reduced

demands in another area (such as using the switch in a

highly familiar activity that demands less focused attention

of the child). The approach enables a child to work on skill

development across a number of areas concurrently

(Burkhart, 2008).

6. Model, model, model.

As identified above, receptive language input is vital before

expression can take place. AAC systems are no different. In

order for a child to learn to use an AAC system effectively,

their communication partners must also use the same

system (Porter, 2012; Van Tatenhove, 1987). This use is

Cress & Marvin, 2003; Drager et al., 2010; Judge et al.,

2010; Van Tatenhove, 1987). The ability to exert control and

influence others is a motivating driver for most people.

Through the use of personalised core and fringe vocabulary,

an AAC user can realise the power that these words have

over others, and over their environment. For example the

use of the word

more

enables continuation of a preferred

activity (e.g., more tickles, more blocks to build a tower

before knocking it down), the use of the word

stop

facilitates cessation of something undesired (e.g., to stop

another person’s turn with a toy so the child can play with

it). Robust vocabulary selection and motivational contexts

facilitate the development of a wider range of

communicative functions. It is critical for team members,

including the child’s family, to work collaboratively to ensure

appropriate vocabulary selection for motivating and

meaningful interactions (Horn & Kang, 2012; Trembath et

al., 2007). Please see

http://aackids.psu.edu/index.php/

page/show/id/4 for further suggestions of how to identify

motivating and powerful communication opportunities (Light

& Drager, 2012).

3. Ensure key communication partners

receive robust coaching on AAC use

and how to support communication

interactions.

The role of communication partners is essential for

successful interactions. A skilled communication partner

has the ability to recognise communication attempts, to

scaffold these attempts, to role model language use, and to

shape behaviours towards more appropriate forms of

communication (Olive et al., 2008). In the initial stage of

AAC intervention, the main focus for clinicians could be to

coach communication partners on the continuum of AAC

methods (e.g., unaided and aided), the use of different

interaction strategies, and general information about

language development (Blackstone, 1999; Cress & Marvin,

2003; Judge et al., 2010; Romski & Sevcik, 2005; Van

Tatenhove, 1987). The training could also include

consideration of environmental modifications required in

order to facilitate successful interactions (Judge et al.,

2010), for example, the positioning of AAC systems in

relation to light sources or objects that may cause

distraction.

A number of studies have shown that communication

partners can implement highly successful AAC interventions

following training (McConkey et al., 2010; Olive et al.,

2008; Romski et al., 2010; Stahmer & Ingersoll, 2004).

Furthermore, communication partner training has produced

positive results in terms of parents’ perceptions of their

child’s abilities and overall parental well-being (McConkey

et al., 2010; Romski et al., 2011). Parents obviously have

a very important role as primary communication partners

for young children with CCN. It is imperative, however,

that clinicans acknowledge the demands facing parents

of children with disabilities. They must consider and

regularly re-evaluate the goals and capabilities of families

when planning and implementing AAC with young children

(Marshall & Goldbart, 2008).

The CONNECT website contains useful resources for

team training regarding environmental adaptations and

the importance of embedding interventions within naturally

occurring routines (please see:

http://community.fpg. unc.edu/connect-modules/learners/module-1

for further

information).