Previous Page  177 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 177 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUST 1986

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

GAZETTE

Vol. No. 80 No. 6

July/August 1986

In this issue . . .

Comment 167 Performance Guarantees 169

Expediting Registrations in the Land

Registry

178

Tipperary Bar Association AGM

179

Kings Cup Football Tournament 180 Profit Sharing 183 Correspondence 187

Professional Information

189

Executive Editor:

Editorial Board:

Advertising

Co-ordinator:

Printing:

Mary Buckley

Charles Meredith, Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Geraldine Clarke

Michael V. O'Mahony

Maxwell Sweeney

Sean OhOisin. Tel. 305236

307860

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford

The views expressed in this publication, save where other-

wise indicated, are the views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in this publication

does not necessarily indicate approval by the Society for

the product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

Comment . ..

. . . Unwelcome Publicity

T

he vast majority of practising solicitors have

been embarrassed yet again by a tiny minority of

colleagues who have been paying below the rates of pay

fixed by the Joint Labour Committee for Law Clerks. A

recent newspaper headline: "Lawyers top the list of law

breakers on minimum pay", unjustifiably leaves us all

feeling guilty. Who were those solicitors who, during

1985 and during earlier years also, topped or nearly

topped the list of employers in breach of Joint Labour

Committee Orders? The Law Society, over many years,

has indicated to the profession that it will treat the non-

payment of solicitors of these statutory minimum rates

of pay as being unprofessional and subject to

disciplinary action. Equally, over a number of years, the

Law Society has requested from the Department of

Labour the names of the defaulters ascertained by its

inspectorate, but the Department has always declined to

furnish that information, leaving the Law Society

impotent to take direct action against such defaulters.

That the number of solicitor/employers involved is

very small is self-evident. Apparently, in 1985, the

arrears of under-payments collected by the Department

of Labour from solicitors totalled just over £35,000 —

not a large sum taken in the context of the almost 1,400

firms of solicitors operating in the State.

It is certainly true that solicitors like many other self-

employed people are finding it hard to make ends meet

in the difficult times we are living in. However, that

cannot be an excuse for breaking the minimum pay

Order. If a solicitor cannot afford to pay at least the

legal minimum rates to his employees, he should

consider reducing the number of staff. Properly paid

staff are usually more willing and more productive and

thus more valuable.

Let us hope that 1985 will have been the last year that

solicitors will appear anywhere near the top of this

particular league table.

167