Previous Page  80 / 330 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 330 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

APRIL 1986

INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY OF IRELAND

GAZETTE

Vol. No. 80 No. 3

APRIL 1986

In this issue . . .

EEC Directive on Products Liability - Part II 73 Irish Apprentices at Jessup Moot 76

Society of Young Solicitors

21st Anniversary Seminar

79

Reciprocity of Qualifications and Employment

Opportunities Abroad

81

Deposits on New Residential Properties 83 Building Defects and Latent Damage 89

Crossword

97

Dail Debates 99 Education Note 99

Practice Notes

Professional Information 102

The Appointment of Judges

(C'ontd. from p.69)

Executive Editor:

Editorial Board:

Advertising:

Printing:

Mary Buckley

William Earley, Chairman

John F. Buckley

Gary Byrne

Geraldine Clarke

Charles R. M. Meredith

Michael V. O'Mahony

Maxwell Sweeney

Liam O hOisin, Telephone 305236

Turner's Printing Co. Ltd., Longford

The views expressed in this publication, save where other-

wise indicated, are the views of the contributors and not

necessarily the views of the Council of the Society.

The appearance of an advertisement in this publication

does not necessarily indicate approval by the Society for

the product or service advertised.

Published at Blackhall Place, Dublin 7.

procedure and sentencing, visits to prisons and youth

detention centres and at least a week spent sitting on the

Bench with a Circuit Judge.

Other Common Law jurisdictions have quite

sophisticated systems of training junior judges and indeed

of requiring more senior judges to participate in further

regular training programmes. To continue to rely on the

principle that all practising lawyers have acquired by

experience, osmosis or divine inspiration the ability to

administer justice in a satisfactory manner at 24 hours'

notice does not stand up to serious examination.

Increasingly when practitioners are specialising in

particular areas of law they are less likely than their

predecessors were to have a general knowledge of the

working of most areas of the law.

Suggestions have from time to time been made that some

panel might be established which would approve

candidates for appointment to the judiciary. Such panels

operate in very large jurisdictions such as the United

States in respect of appointments to the Federal Judiciary.

In a small community it could be invidious to have a panel

having the exclusive right to make recommendations for

such appointments even if such procedure were politically

acceptable. The introduction of a system of monitoring

candidates through part time appointments should lessen

the need for further monitoring. If it is still found

advisable to have some external monitoring system it

might be possible to adopt a vetting procedure whereby

the Government of the day would submit a list of

prospective appointees to the monitoring panel who

could indicate if any of the prospective appointees were

deemed to be unsuitable. In this way the Government

would retain its control over the making of the

appointments while the screening process would rule out

those who were for one reason or another consided to

be unsuitable candidates.

Under our Constitution judges once appointed are only

removable from office by joint resolution of the Houses

of the Oireachtas. This is clearly an important bulwark

in the independence of the judiciary. It does not however

follow that judges need necessarily be appointed for life.

Whether it is wise to appoint persons in their 30's to a

position which they will hold until they are at least 65

must be open to question. Judges are not immune to the

frailties of human nature and can become as different

and testy as time passes as the next man. There may well

be a case for putting a time limit, perhaps a period of

20 to 25 years, on the period for which a judge should serve. •

71