Previous Page  85 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 85 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Looking Ahead

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org

|

83

|

to promote a deeper understanding of why poverty and

homelessness occur, and allow students to explore “what if”

possibilities that challenge the status quo. However, to do so we

need to facilitate authentic learning experiences that provide

students with opportunities to take action in relation to the issue.

Doing More: Creating Authentic

Learning Experiences Grounded in

Children’s Literature

Critical literacy scholars discuss many ways to create authentic

experiences that move toward action in relation to picture

book read-alouds that explicitly address social justice issues

such as poverty and homelessness. Authenticity is an important

element so that students are able to reflect on what they have

learned and how their views or opinions may have changed

after their experience. For instance, Short (2011) highlights

one way to engage children in authentic action in response

to social justice themed children’s literature: “Authentic action

is based in children having responsibility throughout the

process, including witnessing the outcome of their action when

possible. A continuous cycle of action and reflection spirals

throughout the process” (p. 54). A poignant example in Short’s

article is when the students decided to clean up their school’s

playground. After the initial clean up the students investigated

where the trash came from and were shocked to learn it was

from them. The students then took action to move the trashcan

to a different part of the playground to help alleviate the trash

problem and put the receptacle in a more usable location.

In another insightful discussion of children’s literature

addressing low socioeconomic status or “tight times,” Kathy Short

(2011) compared three books –Monica Gunning’s (2004)

A Shelter

in Our Car

,

Those Shoes

by Maribeth Boelts (2007), and Vera B.

Williams’ (1982)

A Chair for My Mother

. Short describes how a class

discussed all the books in terms of wants and needs and created a

continuum of where the books fit in those terms. This continuum

“provided a way for children to access difficult issues in their

community and provided a bridge for connecting to these issues

on a global level” (p. 53). Utilizing the books in this way allowed

the students to make connections to their own lives when maybe

times were tough or with some experience they might have had.

This also helped the students to understand that there are varying

and changing levels of poverty. The children in this particular

classroom were negotiating a more nuanced understanding of

socioeconomic status; one that was not static and simple, but

rather fluid and complex (i.e. shaped by larger social structures).

Chafel, Seely Flint, Hammel, and Harpole Pomeroy (2007)

also share stories of both teachers and researchers who utilized

critical literacy in their elementary classrooms to engage

children in topics that included poverty and other social issues.

Harpole Pomeroy describes her experience as a teacher in an

emergency shelter school and some of the discussions she

had with her students about their personal experiences living

in poverty. By building on students’ lived experiences through

literature, Harpole Pomeroy goes beyond a pedestrian approach

to social justice-themed children’s literature (O’Neil, 2010). In

other words, to move beyond talk about global issues into

authentic and meaningful action for social change

…c

hildren

and adolescents need perspective, not protection as they

consider who they are in the process of becoming and how they

can make a difference” (Short, Giorgi & Lowery, 2013, p. 35).

Doing More In Relation to the

Common Core State Standards

Given the emphasis on close reading and deep understanding

in the Common Core State Standards, scholars remind us of the

“bigger task” at hand. Cunningham and Enriquez (2013) assert:

The CCSS ask teachers to think deeply about what it

means to be truly literate in the twenty-first century:

that we comprehend

as well as

critique, value citing

evidence from the text, and come to understand other

perspectives and cultures (p.28).

Indeed teachers, and their educators, need to be

aware of how effectively children’s literature can be

incorporated into the classroom, not only as an exercise in

close reading, but also as an exercise in civic engagement

(Wolk, 2013). There is so much to be gained from use of

this type of literature including involving students in social

action projects that they help to create themselves.

For example, in a discussion of critical literacy practices

in a first-grade classroom, Mary Cowhey (2006) examines

how to reimagine the traditional school food drive:

Food drives can be a developmentally appropriate

activity for young children when used as a vehicle

to do the following: Challenge stereotypes; Teach

understanding of the complexity of the causes of

poverty; Introduce local activists and organizers as role

models addressing needs and working for long-term

solutions; Empower children to take responsibility in

their community; Remove the stigma of poverty. (p. 29)

A traditional food drive is one in which no stereotypes of

poverty are either addressed or challenged, no critical questions

are asked of the students as to why poverty and homelessness

occur, no activists are introduced, and students are not empowered

to take the lead in creating social action in the community. This

traditional approach does not encourage students to dig deeper

into the root causes of the issue, it only allows the students to

provide a superficial solution to a more widespread issue.

Cowhey moves beyond a pedestrian approach to issues of

hunger in relation to poverty and homelessness; she is employing

thoughtful critical literacy practices that aid in the facilitation

of social change. Her re-imagination of the traditional food

drive promotes multiple levels of understanding (i.e. individual,

community, systemic) and allows students to achieve a greater

level of understanding than a pedestrian approach would. Indeed,

there is a growing body of critical literacy scholarship about

how to create authentic learning experiences that incorporate