Previous Page  13 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

whether a gift which was clearly educational was a

valid charitable gift, it xvas not relevant to evaluate

the contribution made, but that did not prevent the

court from ascertaining, if necessary by evidence,

whether a gift had any educational tendency, and

that in the present case such evidence must be

received ; second, that the gift, which included some

objects of historical interest and of artistic interest,

though slight, might be of public benefit and was,

therefore, a valid charitable bequest. The next-of-

kin of the testator appealed :

Held, (Harman, Davies and Russell

L.JJ

.).

(1) that on the true construction of

the w

ill and

codicils the testator's intention was that the entire

contents of the studio should be exhibited as a whole,

the only exception being that articles not of an

antique nature might be disposed of so that the

selective exhibition, which was essential to the judge's

conclusion, was not justified by the terms of the will.

(2) That where the validity of a gift to establish a

museum was concerned and the utility of the gift

was brought in question, it was essential for the

court to know something of the quality and artistic

or aesthetic merit of the proposed exhibits in order

to judge whether they would be conducive to the

education of the public, and for that purpose to hear

expert evidence :

while the quality and artistic or

aesthetic merit of the proposed collection of exhibits

was a matter of taste, and tastes differed, there was

an accepted canon of taste on which the court had

to rely, for it had no judicial knowledge of such

matters itself.

(3) That the evidence was overwhelming that the

collection of proposed exhibits was worthless as a

means of education, and no useful purpose could be

served by foisting on the public a " mass of junk "

and that, therefore, the gifts did not constitute a

valid charitable trust.

In re Pinion, deed. Westminster Bank Ltd.

v.

Pinion & Anor. (1964) 2 WL.R. 919.

THE INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY

OF IRELAND

EXAMINATION DATES 1965

EXAMINATION DATES 1964

Examination

Book-keeping

First and Second

Irish

First Law

Second Law

Third Law

Preliminary

First & Second

Irish

Date

22nd June

3rd July

ist & znd Sept.

4th & 5th Sept.

ist, 2nd & 3rd Sept.

ist & 2nd Sept.

Last Day

for Entry

ist June

12th June

loth Aug.

12th Aug.

loth Aug.

nth Aug.

Examination

First Law

Second Law

Third Law

Preliminary

First & Second

Irish

Book-keeping

Date

ist & 2nd Feb.

ist & 2nd Feb.

3rd, 4th & 5th Feb.

2nd & 3rd Feb.

12th February

22nd February

Last Day

for Entry

nth Jan.

nth Jan.

13th Jan.

12th Jan.

22nd Jan.

ist Feb.

nth September

2ist Aug.

SOLICITORS' BENEVOLENT

ASSOCIATION

Notice of election to vacant annuity

Take Notice that it is intended to hold an Election

for the Solicitors' Benevolent Association Centenary

Annuity of £100 per annum.

Information and

application forms are available from the undersigned

to whom completed application forms should be

returned not later than loth day of June, 1964. For

eligibility attention is drawn to Rules 3 and 31 of the

Rules of the Association adopted 26th January, 1962.

Dated this i6th day of May, 1964.

EUNAN McCARRON, Secretary, Solicitor's Benevolent

Association, 18 Hume Street, Dublin.

THE REGISTRY

Register A

DUBLIN Solicitor with well established and thriving Practice

would be interested in amalgamation or Partnership with

another. Box. No. A.214.

REGISTRATION OF TITLE ACTS,

1891 AND 1942

Issue of New Land Certificate

Applications

have been

received

from

the

registered owners mentioned

in

the Schedule

annexed hereto, for the issue of Certificates of Title

in substitution for the original Certificates issued in

respect of the lands specified in the said Schedule,

which original Certificates, it is alleged, have been

lost or inadvertently destroyed.

A new Certificate will be issued in each case,

except a case in respect of which notification is

received in this Registry within 28 days from the

publication of this notice, that the Certificate of

Title is still in existence, and in the custody of some

person other than the registered owner. Any such

notification should state the grounds on which such

Certificate is being held.

Dated the 22nd day of June, 1964.

D. L. McAmsTER,

Registrar of Titles.