Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  285 / 620 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 285 / 620 Next Page
Page Background

Laboratory Qualification

Two qualification samples were provided. These qualification samples were used to

optimize each participant’s instrument and chromatography. Before proceeding with the

MLT, each participant’s qualification results were sent to and approved by the Study

Director.

After preparation of the stock and working solutions, the performance of the instruments

was determined. The second highest concentration (50 IU/mL) working standard was

injected at least five consecutive times. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of each

compound response for at least five injections must not have been more than 3% for both

forms of the vitamin. After the above criteria were met, the analyst could analyze the

qualification samples. The qualification samples had known amounts of vitamin D

2

and/or vitamin D

3

. After analysis of the qualification samples, the laboratories sent the

qualification result form to the Study Director to review the data. After successful

qualification sample analysis, the data was approved by the Study Director and the

analyst proceeded with the analysis of the test samples.

Data Reporting

Participants were asked to record all observations and any potential method deviations.

In addition, the participants were asked to investigate any potential aberrant results in an

attempt to determine the root cause such as: incorrect calculations, final units incorrect,

transposition errors, incorrect standard preparation or possible contamination. It was also

a requirement to have all the results and calculations reviewed by a peer, laboratory

supervisor or manager.

Data Analysis

The Study Director reviewed and compiled all the data submitted by the participants.

Statistical analysis was conducted using the AOAC spreadsheet for blind duplicates [1].

The following tests were utilized in the AOAC spreadsheet for blind duplicates [1] to

determine outliers: (i) Cochran test

for removal of laboratories showing significantly

greater variability among replicate (within-laboratory) analyses than the other

laboratories for a given material and (ii) Grubbs tests for removal of laboratories with

extreme averages. The spreadsheet was used to calculate the following:

mean analyte concentrations

standard deviation (S

r

) relative standard deviation (RSD

r

) for repeatability (for

blind duplicate data)

standard deviation (S

R

) and relative standard deviation (RSD

R

) for reproducibility

number of valid data points

HorRat value (RSD

R

/predicted RSD

R

)

2011.11 VITAMIN D MLT-Sept 2015

FOR ERP USE ONLY

DO NOT DISTRIBUTE