Previous Page  206 / 431 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 206 / 431 Next Page
Page Background

City of Morgan Hill

Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Inflow/Infiltration Study

12-0248 AEG CofMorganHill FM Rpt.docx

Page 23 of 46

Flow Monitoring: Peak Measured Flows and Pipeline Capacity Analysis

Peak measured flows and the corresponding flow levels (depths) are important to understand the

capacity limitations of a collection system. The peak flows and flow levels reported are from the peak

measurements as taken across the entirety of the flow monitoring period. Peak flows and levels may

not correspond to a rainfall event, but instead may be caused due to blockages, grease or roots that

cause a backflow condition.

Two key capacity analysis terms are defined as follows:

Peaking Factor:

Peaking factor is defined as the peak measured flow divided by the average

dry weather flow (ADWF). A peaking factor threshold value of 3.0 is commonly used for

sanitary sewer design.

d

/

D

Ratio:

The

d

/

D

ratio is the peak measured depth of flow (

d

) divided by the pipe diameter

(

D

). A

d

/

D

ratio of 0.75 is a common maximum threshold value used for pipe design. The

d

/

D

ratio for each site was computed based on the maximum depth of flow from the flow

monitoring study.

Table 9 s

ummarizes the peak recorded flows, levels,

d

/

D

ratios, and peaking factors per site during

the flow monitoring period. Capacity analysis data is presented on a site-by-site basis and represents

the hydraulic conditions only at the site locations; hydraulic conditions in other areas of the collection

system will differ.

Table 9. Capacity Analysis Summary

Metering

Site

ADWF

(mgd)

Peak

Measured

Flow

(mgd)

Peaking

Factor

Diameter

(in)

Peak

Level

(in)

Peak

d

/

D

Ratio

Level

Surcharged

above

Crown (ft)

Site 1

0.19

0.56

2.93

18

3.73

0.21

-

Site 2

0.36

0.88

2.45

19.75

7.94

0.40

-

Site 3

0.32

0.93

2.95

15

13.13

0.88

-

Site 4

0.21

0.53

2.49

12

6.04

0.50

-

Site 5

1.15

2.29

1.98

24

15.95

0.66

-

Site 6

0.35

0.91

2.60

17.75

12.52

0.71

-

Site 7

0.24

0.77

3.17

21

6.82

0.32

-

Site 8

0.16

0.43

2.73

17.5

6.76

0.39

-

Site 9

0.13

0.41

3.03

15

6.36

0.42

-

Site 10

0.12

0.31

2.45

11.75

4.57

0.39

-

The following capacity analysis results are noted:

Peaking Factor:

Sites 7 and 9 had peaking factors that slightly exceeded typical design

threshold limits for the ratio of peak flow to average dry weather flow.

d

/

D

Ratio:

Only Site 3 had a

d

/

D

ratio that exceeded the common design threshold for

d

/

D

ratio. None of the flow monitoring sites reached surcharge conditions.