Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  289 / 363 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 289 / 363 Next Page
Page Background

S

chneider

&

A

ndersen

:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

.

98, N

o

. 3, 2015 

661

and LCV-D6). To prepare each of these solutions, combine

1 mL of each individual stock solution required for the mixture

and dilute to 100 mL final volume with acetonitrile. These

solutions are stored in glass at –20°C and protected from light

(stated stability = 1 month).

(

c

)

 Working standard solutions

.—Prepare five to six working

standard solutions. Six will be described here (WS 1–6). These

are prepared by diluting aliquots (0, 50, 100, 200, 500, and

1000 µL, respectively) of the mixed intermediate standard

solution of analytes to a final volume of 10 mL with acetonitrile.

The resultant working standard solutions thus contain 0, 5, 10,

20, 50, and 100 µg/L, respectively, of the analytes. Prepare

a working standard solution of internal standards by taking

400 µL of the mixed intermediate internal standard solution

and diluting to a final volume of 10 mL with acetonitrile (final

concentration 40 μg/L). Prepare all working standard solutions

daily. These solutions may be kept at room temperature but

protected from light.

F. Sample Preparation

(

a

)

 Homogenization of samples

.—Homogenize muscle

tissue with dry ice in a food processor to produce a finely

ground powder. Allow the dry ice to sublime at –20°C and then

store the homogenized tissues at –80°C. Homogenize salmon

with attached skin, but for catfish, homogenize only the skinless

filet. Remove shells, legs, and heads from shrimp prior to

homogenization.

(

b

)

 Extracted matrix calibrant samples.—

Accurately weigh

2.00 g (±0.02 g) portions of homogenized negative control

tissue into each of six 50 mL disposable centrifuge tubes. Once

thawed, fortify these samples (extracted calibrants 1–6) with

100 µL aliquots of WS1, WS2, WS3, WS4, WS5, and WS6,

respectively. To each tube then add 100 μL internal standard

working solution. The extracted matrix calibrant samples

are thus fortified with 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 µg/kg of

analytes and 2.0 µg/kg of internal standards. Allow calibrants

to equilibrate 15 min protected from light before beginning the

extraction with the addition of hydroxylamine solution. [

Note

:

Method

2012.25

specifies that five extracted matrix calibrants

are prepared in the range 0 to 2 µg/kg with concentrations 0,

0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 µg/kg of analytes (8). For the collaborative

study, the range was extended from 0 to 5 µg/kg to ensure

that residues found in incurred samples would fall within the

calibration range.]

(

c

)

 Extraction of samples

.—Accurately weigh

2.00 g

(±0.02 g) portions of homogenized tissue into 50 mL disposable

centrifuge tubes and let thaw. Fortify thawed tissue with

100 μL internal standard working solution (2.0 µg/kg), and

allow samples to equilibrate for 15 min while protected from

light. Add hydroxylamine solution (9.5 g/L, 500 μL) to the

samples, vortex mix briefly, and allow samples to stand in

the dark for 10 min. Add acetonitrile (8 mL) and 1.0 g (±0.1)

anhydrous magnesium sulfate to each tube. Vortex mix tubes

(1 min, maximum speed), then shake tubes (10 min) using a

rotary stirrer or a multitube vortexer. Centrifuge the tubes

(2000 ×

g

, 5 min, 4°C), and transfer all supernatant to a clean

tube for evaporation. Evaporate the supernatant to dryness

(50°C, N

2

). For the salmon matrix, the point of dryness may

be a viscous oil. Reconstitute the extracted matrix calibrant

samples and test samples with 800 μL Reconstitution Solution.

Vortex mix all samples sufficiently to break up dried extracts;

for example, vortex mixing on high speed for 30 s followed

by 10 min of mixing on a multitube vortexer ensures complete

dissolution of analytes and internal standards. Transfer extracts

to microcentrifuge tubes, centrifuge at 20 000 ×

g

for 5 min, and

filter (PVDF, 0.45 μm) into autosampler vials for LC-MS/MS

analysis. The extraction results in a 2.5X concentration factor;

therefore, a calibrant or sample fortified at 1.0 µg/kg in the

seafood matrix will produce an extract with an equivalent

concentration of 2.5 µg/L in the LC vial.

G. LC-MS/MS Analysis

(

a

)

 LC

.—A Waters Corp. Symmetry C

18

or comparable

column is used, with or without a guard column. The mobile

phase was made up of ammonium formate buffer (A, 0.05 M,

pH 4.5) and acetonitrile (B). The gradient program is described

in Table 1. The flow rate is 250 μL/min, the injection volume is

20 μL, and the column oven is set to 30°C. Potential carryover,

particularly from CV can be reduced by injection of water

between each test sample.

(

b

)

Triple quadrupole MS

.—A Waters Corp. Quattro LCZ

triple quadrupole, or comparable instrument is used. The

mass spectrometer is operated in the positive ion mode using

electrospray ionization. Two SRM transitions are collected

for each analyte and one SRM transition is collected for each

internal standard; these transitions are detailed in Table 2,

along with instrument parameters for the Waters Quattro LCZ

system. Conditions are optimized so that all SRM transitions

for the lowest concentration solvent calibrant are present with

an acceptable S/N (≥3).

H. Screening

The method can be used to screen test samples against a single

calibrant or to quantify samples using a full calibration curve.

A screen is accomplished by extracting test samples along with

a negative matrix control sample and a matrix sample fortified

at 0.5 µg/kg. Concentration of the test sample is estimated

by comparison of the quantification ion peak area ratio of

sample:internal standard with the corresponding ratio for the

fortified matrix sample. To confirm suspected positive samples,

test samples should be extracted and analyzed in duplicate

along with a range of fortified calibrants (including negative

control). Test samples are then quantified using the calibration

curve according to the quantification method described below

in Section

I

(8).

Table 1. LC elution gradient

Time,

min

A, %

(ammonium formate buffer)

B, %

(acetonitrile)

0

60

40

1

10

90

15

10

90

16

60

40

20

60

40

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

288