Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  350 / 363 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 350 / 363 Next Page
Page Background

448 

C

rowley

et al

.

:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

. 97, N

o

. 2, 2014

F. Results and Interpretation

The results are analyzed automatically by the VIDAS system.

A report is printed which records the type of test performed, the

test sample identification, the date and time, the lot number, and

expiration date of the reagent kit being used, and each sample’s

RFV, test value, and interpreted result (positive or negative).

Fluorescence is measured twice in the reagent strip’s reading

cuvette for each sample tested. The first reading is a background

reading of the substrate cuvette before the SPR is introduced

into the substrate. The second reading is taken after incubating

the substrate with the enzyme remaining on the interior of the

SPR. The test value is calculated by the instrument and is equal

to the difference between the background reading and the final

reading. The calculation appears on the result sheet. A “negative”

result has a test value less than the threshold (0.05) and indicates

that the sample does not contain

L. monocytogenes

or contains

L. monocytogenes

at a concentration below the detection limit.

A “positive” result has a test value equal to or greater than

the threshold (≥0.05) and indicates that the sample may be

contaminated with

L. monocytogenes.

If the background reading

is above a predetermined cutoff, then the result is reported as

invalid (Table

2013.11D

).

G. Confirmation

All positive VIDAS LMX results must be culturally

confirmed. Confirmation should be performed using the non-

heated enrichment broth (the LMX primary enrichment broth

for 25 g test portions and the LPT secondary enrichment broth

for 125 g test portions) stored between 2–8°C, and should be

initiated within 72 h following the end of incubation (AFNOR

Certificate No. BIO 12/33-05/12). Presumptive positive results

may be confirmed by isolating on selective agar plates such as

ALOA or on the appropriate reference method selective agar

plates. Typical or suspect colonies from each plate are confirmed

as described in appropriate reference method. As an alternative to

the conventional confirmation for

L. monocytogenes,

VITEK 2

GP Biochemical Identification (AOAC

2012.02

) or API

Listeria

biochemical kits may be used for presumptive generic

identification of foodborne

L. monocytogenes

.

Results of Collaborative Study

In this collaborative study, the VIDAS

Listeria monocytogenes

(LMX) method was compared to the to AOAC

993.12

for one

food product, queso fresco, at two test portion sizes, 25 and

125 g. A total of 14 laboratories throughout the United States

participated in this study, with 14 laboratories submitting data

for the 25 g test portions and 13 laboratories submitting data for

the 125 g test portions as presented in Table 1. Each laboratory

analyzed 36 test portions for each method 12 inoculated with a

high level of

L. monocytogenes,

12 inoculated with a low level of

L. monocytogenes,

and 12 uninoculated controls. A background

screen of the matrix indicated an absence of indigenous

Listeria

species. As per criteria outlined in Appendix J, fractional positive

results were obtained for both the 25 and 125 g test portions sizes.

For each test portion size, the actual level of

L. monocytogenes

was determined by MPN determination on the day of initiation

of analysis. The results of the inoculum heat-stress protocol

are presented in Table 2. The individual laboratory and sample

results are presented in Tables  3 and 4. Tables

2013.11A

and

B

summarize the collaborative study results for all foods tested,

including POD statistical analysis (10). Detailed results for each

laboratory are presented in Tables  2A–D, and Figures 1A–D and

2A–D as supplemental data on the

J. AOAC Int.

website.

Queso Fresco (25 g Test Portions)

Queso fresco test portions were inoculated at a low and

high level and were analyzed (Table 3) for the detection of

L. monocytogenes

. Uninoculated controls were included in each

analysis. Fourteen laboratories participated in the analysis of

this matrix and the results of 13 laboratories were included in

the statistical analysis. Laboratory 11 reported 11 test portions

(including four uninoculated test portions) that produced

non-

L. monocytogenes

profiles. Colonies on these plates

contained one or more of the following biochemical reactions

not typically associated with

L. monocytogenes

: Gram-negative,

Gram-positive with spores, non-beta-hemolytic, and catalase

negative. Based on the preliminary biochemical tests conducted,

the test portions should not have been carried through for

final biochemical identification on API

Listeria

strips which

resulted in the misidentification of the test portion as

Listeria

spp. The selective agar plates for these test portions were sent

to the coordinating laboratory for further examination. The

coordinating laboratory confirmed the supplementary results

(Gram stain, hemolysis, and catalase reaction) reported by

Table 2013.11D. Interpretation of test

Test value threshold

Interpretation

<0.05

Negative

≥0.05

Positive

Table 1. Participation of each collaborating laboratory

a

Queso fresco

Lab

25 g test portions

125 g test portions

1

Y

Y

2

Y

b

Y

3

Y

Y

4

Y

Y

5

Y

Y

6

Y

Y

7

Y

Y

8

Y

Y

9

Y

Y

10

Y

Y

11

Y

c

Y

c

12

Y

Y

13

Y

Y

14

Y

Y

a

 Y= Collaborator analyzed the food type.

b

 Results were not submitted to the coordinating laboratory.

c

 Results were not used in statistical analysis due to laboratory error.

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

349