Background Image
Previous Page  59 / 108 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 108 Next Page
Page Background

EuroWire – May 2011

57

technical article

Analysis of surface flaws on

drawn wire and wire breaks

By Kazunari Yoshida, Tetsuo Shinohara, Tsutomu Yamashita and Atsuhiro Tanaka of Tokai University, Japan

Abstract:

Using experiments and finite element

method (FEM) analysis, this paper exa-

mines whether surface cracks on wire

rods grow or are removed during drawing.

The deformation behaviour of V-shaped,

concave, and U-shaped transversal cracks

were observed upon repeated drawing.

The authors clarified the conditions under

which these transversal cracks are removed

in order to achieve a surface condition

similar to that of the area without cracks.

1 Introduction

The diameter of wires and bars produced

by drawing varies from about 10μm to

100mm. For any diameter of wire, breaking

during drawing has a direct effect on

productivity. Also, flaws on the surface of

wires often cause fatigue breaking, the

deterioration of mechanical properties,

and loss of commodity value. This is

why surface flaws are the most common

complaint of users. Furthermore, finer

and longer wires have recently been

requested for use as the bonding wires of

semiconductors and in medical devices.

Therefore, wire breaking and surface flaws

are problems that must be solved.

Many researchers have investigated the

optimal die shape to reduce drawing force,

measures to prevent wires from internal

cracking (through the formation of central

burst defects or cupping), the optimal

lubricant, measures for reduction of

residual stress and so forth. Useful findings

have been obtained, but there have been

few studies of measures to prevent wire

breakage and on the effects of inclusions

and surface flaws on wire drawing

1, 4

.

In this study, the causes of wire breakages

in drawn wires of different diameters were

examined. Analyses of wires with surface

flaws and inclusions were performed

experimentally and by a finite element

method (FEM) to determine whether

surface flaws and inclusions cause wire

breakages or remain as surface flaws when

drawing is repeated.

2 Types of wire

breakage caused

by drawing

Recently, the occurrence of wire breaking

during drawing has greatly decreased

due to reduced particulate segregation

and fewer inclusions in bars and wires

brought about by effective material

cleaning and because of the improvement

of drawing conditions. However, the finer

the diameter of a wire, the higher the

frequency of occurrence of wire breakage

during drawing. There are several causes

of wire breaking (

Figure 1

). Two types of

breaking are caused by inclusions.

One occurs when inclusions are found on

the fracture surface, and the other, called

“hollow end” breaking, occurs when traces

of concave inclusions are found but the

inclusions themselves are not found.

Two types of breaking are caused by

foreign materials introduced during a

process other than the casting process.

One is called “contamination” breaking,

when foreign materials are found on the

fracture surface, and the other is called

“pressed hollow” breaking, when no

foreign materials are found. Additionally,

“split end” breaking is considered to be

caused by surface flaws, and “tension”

breaking is caused by applying a stress

stronger than the wire strength

5

.

Figure 1

:

Types of wire breaking

‘Inclusion’

‘Contamination’

‘Pressed hollow’

‘Hollow End’

‘Split End’

‘Tension’

Figure 2

:

Percentages of causes of wire breaking during drawing of superfine gold wires

Inclusion

Hollow end

Contamination

Pressed hollow

Split end

Tension

Others