Background Image
Previous Page  35 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 60 Next Page
Page Background www.speechpathologyaustralia.org.au

JCPSLP

Volume 17, Number 1 2015

33

1996 to 2011 in the in the number of speech pathologists

born outside of Australia. There was a small increase (0.7%)

in the number of speech pathologists born in Southern and

East Africa. However, some consideration must be given to

that fact the “did not respond”/“incomplete response” for

this question for the 2011 census (6%) was double that for

the 1996 census (3%), and thus the rate of speech

pathologists who were born overseas may in fact be slightly

higher.

Regarding linguistic diversity, Lambier (2002) reported

less than 9% of speech pathologists (who were members

of SPA) spoke a language other than English at home. The

Health Workforce Australia (2014) report only considered

whether speech pathologists were born overseas, which

is not necessarily an indicator of cultural and linguistic

diversity, as many overseas born speech pathologists will

come from an English speaking country (e.g., UK), and

many people born in Australia speak other languages. The

SP workforce needs to identify methods to collect data on

participation rates for people from culturally and linguistically

diverse backgrounds, as this is currently not accessible

through government agency reporting. Such data is crucial

to inform the development of targeted strategies aimed

at increasing representation to levels consistent with the

general population.

International SLP students

The Health Workforce Australia (2014) data indicate that

while there was a peak in the proportion of international

students on study visas entering SP programs in 2009

(11.0%), the largest intake of international students was in

2011 (n = 94). The total number of international students

increased from 52 in 2008 to 91 in 2012, consistent with

overall increased program intake numbers, resulting in a

maintenance of the proportion of SP students who were

international students (7.9%). The results do not provide

information regarding course enrolment type (i.e. Bachelor

versus postgraduate), although Atrill, Lincoln, and McAllister

(2012) reported there were a higher proportion of

international students entering graduate than

undergraduate SP programs.

There was a small but steady increase (2.2%) in the

proportion of international students completing SP

programs (11.1% in 2012). This suggests a comparatively

higher completion rate for international SP students. Atrill

and colleagues (2012) reported that cultural and linguistic

background was a more important factor than country of

birth in regard to SP student competency development.

The impact of cultural and linguistic background on both

intake and completion of a speech pathology program in

Australia needs further examination. Consideration must

also be given to a number of factors that may impact future

enrolments of international students into SP programs,

including foreign exchange rates, program costs, English

language requirements, and delivery of SP program content

overseas.

Relevant factors influencing client

attendance at SLP services

Research suggests that some groups in the community

(e.g., Indigenous Australian and culturally and linguistically

diverse families) are less likely to access both health

(Kelaher & Manderson, 2000; Ou, Chen, Hillman &

Eastwood, 2010) and SP services (Broomfield & Dodd,

2004; Pickering & McAllister, 2000). An American review of

cultural and linguistic diversity (CALD) across health care

The 2011 census data (Health Workforce Australia, 2014)

also identified that there were comparatively more males

(7.5%) than females (6.8%) aged over 55 years, indicating

in the next 10 years a greater proportion of males will likely

retire from the profession. Therefore, unless the number

of male entrants into the SP programs increases in the

next six years (i.e., allowing for four years for program

completion), the proportion of males working as speech

pathologists will fall further in the future.

Unfortunately, the university commencement data

indicate that there continues to be poor representation of

males entering SP programs. This suggests that a change

in the sex balance of the SP workforce is not going to

occur in the near future. The information on students both

entering and completing university programs from the

Health Workforce Australia (2014) report provides potential

prediction of the “drop out” rate of male SP students. This

is a crude technique, which acknowledges that not all

students will be required to complete the four years of the

degree and that not all will do so as a full-time students, nor

in consecutive years. Nevertheless, the data indicate that

students who commenced the SP program in 2008 were

95.4% female. However, those completing in 2012 were

97.1% female. This discrepancy indicates that not only are

fewer males entering SP programs, but also that a lower

proportion of those males complete programs. The reasons

for this discrepancy warrant further investigation.

Table 2: Indigenous Australian participation in SP

workforce

Census 1996 Census 2011

Number of speech

pathologists identifying as

Indigenous Australians

3

11

% Indigenous Australian

speech pathologists

.13%

.21%

Source: Health Workforce Australia, 2014

Participation rates of Indigenous

Australians

There is some good news in regards to the participation

rates of speech pathologists identifying as Indigenous

Australians. While the overall number of Indigenous

Australian speech pathologists is still extremely low (n = 11

in 2011), the number has increased nearly four-fold. More

importantly the proportion of Indigenous Australian speech

pathologists has increased by 61%. While this provides a

positive indication of the ability to change the demographic

profile of SP in Australia, it needs to be stressed that there

is still significant work to be done. There needs to be a

concerted effort to strategically increase the Indigenous

Australian participation rate in SP in Australia, in order to be

reflective of the Australian population and to provide a role

model and conduit within with the Indigenous Australian

community and Indigenous Australian clients. The Health

Workforce Australia (2014) report does not provide

information on enrolments or completions of students who

identify as Indigenous Australians.

Participation rates of people who are

culturally and linguistically diverse

The Health Workforce Australia (2014) data suggests a

small increase from 16.3% to 17.1% in the period from