Previous Page  131 / 218 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 131 / 218 Next Page
Page Background

129

Reward modulation of cognitive function: the nucleus accumbens

Histology and pre-surgery differences between groups

Figure 6.3

shows the extent (left) and peaks (right) of the lesions. Although lesions that

extended into the shell were excluded from analyses, a small portion of the striatum dorsal to

the core was sometimes affected. Seven animals were excluded after histology due to either

the presence of unilateral lesions and/or extension of damage into the NAc shell or peaks

located outside of the AcbC, resulting in 12 animals with AcbC lesions and 12 shams.

Prior to surgery, the groupswerewellmatchedondiscrimination training and test performance.

More specifically, on the final day of training, we observed no group-by-accuracy effect on

auditory (F(1,22) = 2.182, p > 0.1) or visual (F(1,22) = 2.644, p > 0.1) discrimination. In

addition, prior to surgery, the lesion group did not differ from the sham group in terms of

rewarded task-switching performance (F(1,22) < 1;

figure 6.4

), or in terms of overall accuracy

on test (F(1,22) < 1).

Retraining

The lesions did not affect discrimination training; by the end of five days of retraining, the

groups did not differ in terms of either auditory or visual discrimination (group x accuracy:

F(1,22) = 2.594, p > 0.1 and F(1,22) < 1, respectively). Also, the surgery did not differentially

affect retraining across 5 days (time x group x accuracy: all F(1,19) < 1). After correcting for

multiple (i.e. 10) tests, animals were able to reliably discriminate between the auditory stimuli

on all 5 days (all F(1,23) > 27.883, all p < 0.001, all η2 > 0.548) and between the visual stimuli

from day 3 onwards (all F(1,23) > 10.731, all p < 0.004, all η2 > 0.318). Animals were not able

to reliably discriminate between the visual stimuli on the first two days (the main effect of

accuracy was not significant after multiple comparison correction: F(1,23) = 8.273, p < 0.009

and F(1,23) = 9.192, p < 0.006, respectively).

Lesions of the nucleus accumbens core affect rewarded task-switching performance

No test-retest effect on rewarded task-switching performance

All animals performed the post-surgery test twice in each reward context. We first confirmed

that the effect of reward on task-switching performance did not vary as function of session

(F(1,22) < 1). Also, there were no overall differences in terms of accuracy between sessions

(F(1,22) = 2.537, p > 0.1) and we did not observe any group differences in accuracy between

the sessions (F(1,22 = 2.152, p > 0.1). In all subsequent analyses, the data were collapsed

across these two sessions.

Lesions of the nucleus accumbens core alter rewarded task-switching performance

Sham surgeries (i.e. pre-surgery test vs. post-surgery tests) had no effect on rewarded task-

switching performance. Surgery did not significantly affect performance in the sham group

(surgery x reward x switching x accuracy: F(1,11) = 2.806, p > 0.1), thus across all sessions,

task-switching performance in the sham group improved in the high- compared with low