Previous Page  128 / 218 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 128 / 218 Next Page
Page Background

126

Chapter 6

Table 6.3

Discrimination training

AUD

VIS

Day

Correct

Mean (SEM)

Incorrect

mean (SEM)

F(1,23)

Correct

Mean(SEM)

Incorrect

mean (SEM)

F(1,23)

1

18.81 (3.07)

18.85 (2.68)

< 1

17.69 (3.02)

20.19 (3.08)

5.429

*

2

29.13 (3.90)

20.10 (2.29)

15.042

***

24.19 (3.20)

24.48 (3.43)

<1

3

28.31 (3.45)

17.17 (2.09)

27.455

***

28.69 (4.41)

26.50 (3.96)

3.372

^

4

40.96 (5.13)

22.85 (2.45)

31.353

***

30.33 (3.17)

29.48 (3.21)

<1

5

44.06 (4.21)

21.54 (2.43)

47.350

***

38.75 (3.37)

34.46 (3.06)

11.607

**

6

45.29 (3.53)

22.44 (2.07)

75.362

***

42.79 (3.68)

35.77 (3.09)

15.027

***

7

56.50 (6.27)

25.98 (3.10)

54.420

***

51.52 (4.59)

44.15 (2.65)

4.347

*

8

58.31 (4.28)

28.90 (3.68)

72.552

***

52.04 (4.25)

40.79 (3.73)

25.108

***

9

65.92 (5.75)

22.10 (2.39)

89.538

***

55.69 (5.78)

40.77 (4.13)

20.971

***

10

68.56 (7.04)

27.52 (2.91)

51.151

***

49.27 (4.85)

37.15 (3.42)

23.008

***

11

66.67 (6.05)

26.60 (2.51)

60.396

***

57.15 (7.47)

36.54 (3.93)

22.899

***

12

67.92 (5.99)

24.35 (2.47)

44.035

***

61.56 (6.01)

40.17 (3.56)

22.500

***

13

75.90 (6.68)

27.23 (3.13)

82.304

***

65.92 (6.75)

49.88 (4.67)

16.281

***

14

82.67 (8.44)

28.81 (3.22)

44.893

***

62.00 (5.95)

39.90 (3.67)

33.093

***

15

78.25 (5.61)

29.77 (2.51)

77.400

***

63.65 (6.01)

39.48 (3.67)

19.949

***

^ = p < 0.1, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001,

bold = significant after correction for multiple (i.e. 30) t-tests: p < 0.001

We anticipated that all animals, except for those with lesions of the AcbC would show

increased flexibility in the high vs. low reward condition. To assess the role of the AcbC,

we first assessed whether surgery affected rewarded task-switching performance in the sham

and lesion group separately, by comparing performance on pre- and post-surgery sessions.

We anticipated an effect of surgery in the lesion group, but not in the sham group. Next,

we assessed group effects on rewarded task-switching performance, by directly comparing

the group effect in the pre- and post-surgery sessions separately. We anticipated differences

between the sham and lesion group after, but not prior to surgery.