Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  53 / 120 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 120 Next Page
Page Background

MINING FOR CLOSURE

35

tion considered by industrial interests to be “dan-

gerous” to a definitive stakeholder when it acquired

legitimacy via success in free national elections).

Certainly in a mining context, the ability of parties

such as NGOs – even small local NGOs – to broad-

cast their issues (via the internet for example) and

to rally support from a diverse range of actors has

grown markedly in recent years (Antypas, 2005).

When powerful and influential actors take up their

issues such stakeholders can become definitive.

Finally, it is important to note that social actors

generally exist that have none of the important at-

tributes at a certain point in time. This does not

imply however, that they will not at some stage ac-

quire one or more attributes. The class of potential

stakeholders is real and can evolve into an active

category at any time.

3.2

The motivations for inclusion of Section 3 in this

document have been threefold. Firstly, it is consid-

ered valuable to provide an outline of the manner

in which stakeholders may have salience to a min-

ing development or abandoned or orphaned site.

In this case, the three determinants power, legiti-

macy and urgency have been utilised. Secondly, it

has been sought to provide a manner in which to

map stakeholders. Here a diagrammatic represen-

tation has been utilised for that purpose (after the

work of Mitchell, 1997). Thirdly, it has been sought

to show in some small way, the pathways via which

stakeholders can gain such ascendancy that they

have the means to dictate the manner course that

a mining development might take – particularly in

situations where they consider that the mining ac-

tivities or their legacies affect their lives negatively.

As an example of this in a mining context, Figure

3.2 indicates a theoretical transition to a definitive

position by a dependent community near a mining

activity. Here, their urgent and legitimate claims

against a mining activity are brought to the notice

of, and taken up by dominant stakeholders. In this

instance power is provided then by senior politi-

cians or international NGOs – actors who have the

power to force changes, but who until this point did

not perceive the issue to have urgency. Such a proc-

ess has been facilitated in this theoretical case, by

demanding stakeholders such as National NGOs

who lack the legitimate claim of the local commu-

nities but can amplify the voice of the community

– and who through the community, may also find a

legitimate platform for their opposition to a devel-

opment. Parallels to such a migration of influence

can be found in mining and other industrial set-

tings all around the world.

Figure 3.2

Transformation from a dependant into a

definitive

stakeholder

Assuch,thematerialinthissectionshould,

interalia

:

help clarify who can be important to the con-

duct of mining activities;

help clarify why such actors are motivated

and/or active – or dormant;

heighten awareness amongst miners and deci-

sion-makers of what can happen;

provide understanding of how such events can

transpire – e.g. the manner in which control

of natural mineral resources can be lost or

projects delayed.

In the context of

Mining for Closure

, a mapping of

the relevant stakeholders with clearly identified

parameters of salience is intended to help clarify

those consequences that may arise if

best environ-

mental practice for mining

is not carried out, if the

underlying motivations for

Mining for Closure

are

not clearly communicated to constituencies, and

if effective dialogue with affected stakeholders is

not achieved. Conversely, these conceptual frames

should help clarify the benefits of mining best en-

vironmental practice, clear communication and

awareness of constituencies.

stakeholders & the

potential use of

this document

Dormant

e.g. international NGOs &

senior governmental actors

Demanding

e.g. anti-developers &

single interest groups

Discretionary

Dominant

Dependent

e.g. affected

citizens/commun-

ities & nature

Dangerous

Definitive

POWER

LEGITIMACY

URGENCY

Pathways for affected

communities to become

definitive

POWER

URGENCY