Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  121 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 121 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

115

Zucker Systems

against standard review Performance Standards to determine whether Standards are

being met and often. The data also allows them to ensure that enough staff are

available to accommodate service demands, which is particularly important in

communities, such as this, that offer the service to any project (e.g., as opposed to

some communities that only offer the service to applicants with key economic

development projects).

The City has not established performance standards for expedited review services or

standard review services and data was not available to show that expedited reviews

consistently occur more rapidly than standard reviews.

Staff indicated that the utilization of contract planners increases the processing

capacity of the Division and ensures that expedited projects are processed and

managed quicker that they could be by regular full time staff. While we agree that the

utilization of contract planners does expand available staffing resources, we are not

convinced that applicants paying for expedited services are consistently receiving

more rapid development review processing, since data is not available to demonstrate

such. For example, we heard from staff and focus groups that engineering reviews are

chronically late.

119.

Recommendation:

The Community Development Director should establish

Performance Standards for expedited review, which should be included in the

TRAKiT system and tracked, monitored and reported, weekly.

See the “Performance Standards” heading for recommended Performance

Standards.

GIS System

Staff reported that the GIS system needs to be further enhanced and updated so that it

offers a reliable, accurate and robust tool for the Division and other City functions.

Staff noted that a GIS operations plan has not been established so there has been

inconsistent effort expended to update and manage data layers (e.g., addresses), so

data is not reliable.

In an effort to make the system more robust and accessible to Planners and other

internal users, one of the Planners voluntarily added data layers and created a web

based mapping system, titled “MH Maps,” and we applaud the Planner’s efforts in

this regard. However, maintaining this this voluntary work effort has proven to be

challenging since it competes with more pressing work priorities. As such, the system

has not been fully updated in nearly 5 years.