Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  119 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 119 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

113

Zucker Systems

the centralized phone receptionist chronically routes calls erroneously, which

frustrates and overburdens staff.

Additionally, calls are generally filtered through a central receptionist, which does not

routinely perform adequate screening in order to route callers to the correct staff

person.

118.

Recommendation:

The City Manager should ensure that the Central

Receptionist function receives adequate training to filter incoming calls so that

they are routed to the appropriate staff.

Also see our above recommendation to front provide reception staff with additional

training to filter calls more effectively.

A formal return email and phone call policy should be included in the Division’s

Policy & Procedures Manual that requires all staff to return all phone calls and emails

before the end of the day to further the City’s overall goal of providing excellent

customer service. This was included in an earlier recommendation.

Training/Cross Training

Staff indicated that some training has occurred outside of the office in recent years,

however, staffing constraints have left staff with little time to attend outside training.

In addition, some staff and focus group interviewees reported that additional

supervisory training appears to be necessary for managers and supervisors, as well as

development review processing training for some contract planners and newly hired

planners.

For example, it was widely reported that some contract planners are not adequately

supervised and are not properly trained on the City’s development review process,

code interpretation practices, policies, philosophies and file maintenance

requirements. As a result, development review processing and file maintenance varies

significantly among planners. These differences have created frustration for

developers and regular full time planning staff. For example, regular full time staff

must take over contract planners’ projects at the implementation stage (e.g., building

and engineering permit processes) because Contract Planners only process current

planning projects through the decision-making stage (e.g., Director, Planning

Commission and/or Council approval). Processing and file maintenance differences

among contract planners and regular full time staff often prevents a seamless

transition, which slows processing.

In addition, there is a perception by some that newer planners are not being

appropriately integrated into the City’s system and instead have been inserting their