Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  129 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 129 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

123

Zucker Systems

As the above table shows, the City has created a Decision Making Authority structure

for the Planning Division, where the staff or Director has administrative decision-

making authority on fairly routine and applications, such as Conceptual Plan Reviews,

Downtown Administrative Use Permits, Minor Exceptions, Lot Line Adjustments,

Subdivision Exemptions, Sign Permits and others noted in the table above. In

California best practice communities, we often see that the less complicated

applications, which may be exempt from CEQA, are approved at the staff and/or

Director level, often over-the-counter.

The Planning Commission (PC) has been given recommendation authority on

legislative acts, such as Annexations, General Plan Amendments and others and

decision-making authority on Use Permits, Cultural Resource applications, Measure C

Residential Development Control System (RDCS), Parcel Maps, etc. In addition, the

PC acts as an Appeals body on Director decisions, which is a typical decision

authority structure.

The City Council has authority for legislative acts, such as General Plan and Zoning

Amendments. The Council also makes decisions on Development Agreements that

are largely associated with the Measure C RDCS, Lot Mergers, Extensions of Time,

Interim Use Permits and others.

Best practice communities are increasingly delegating more decision making to the

PC and Director/staff level, so that council is focused on legislative decision-making,

appeals and other matters, which is generally the case in Morgan Hill, as such we do

not recommend any changes to the decision-making authority structure.

Administrative Over-the-Counter Approval Processes

Best Practice communities have generally incorporated the philosophy of allowing

administrative approvals for routine types of applications, such as sign permits, minor

exceptions/deviations and minor amendments. To facilitate over-the-counter

approvals, simplified submittal requirements and approval criteria are adopted for

these processes. We are advocates of over-the-counter processes because they

expedite approvals on routine applications and free up staff time to focus on more

complex applications.

Staff stated the only planning application permits processed over-the-counter are Sign

Permits and Temporary Banner Permits because they do not require public notice

(e.g., adjacent property notice). The Development Services Technician and Planner on

Duty (POD) are generally responsible for processing over-the-counter planning

permits. Tree Removal Permits are not processed over-the-counter as we have seen in

other communities, due to the public notice (e.g., posting) requirements, which is

appropriate given that tree resources are controversial in the City.