Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  133 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 133 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

127

Zucker Systems

been included in accordance with the Division’s checklist and if so, logs the

application into the paper log book, calculates and accepts fees and provides a

written receipt to the applicant.

We received feedback from some staff that incomplete applications are

accepted at times.

129.

Recommendation:

The CDD should issue a formal policy to reject

incomplete applications and include it in the updated PPM.

3.

The application materials are forwarded to the Municipal Services Assistant

(MSA), who logs the project into the Tide Mark permitting software system,

creates a paper file with a case number and date stamps and labels all

materials. The MSA then distributes materials electronically or by paper

copies, (e.g., depending on the reviewer) for a 14-calendar day review to city

DRC members and external reviewers, which may include staff in the Police

Department, Building, Public Works, Fire, Housing, Santa Clara Valley Water

District, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Pacific Gas & Electric

and Morgan Hill Unified School District.

Staff has created an application routing form that specifies which reviewers

receive application materials by application type. Staff stated that plans are not

uploaded into Tide Mark. Staff indicated that less complicated plans are routed

electronically, while more detailed plans are routed in paper form.

See above recommendation regarding electronic submittal, which will

eliminate the paper log and submittal practice.

The 14-day review period is not considered a formal Performance Standard by

the CDD or reviewers and is often not met by some reviewers, particularly

Engineering.

130.

Recommendation:

The CDD should establish a review Performance

Standard for the Conceptual and Preliminary Plan processes.

See our recommendations under the “Performance Standards” heading for

recommended standards for this process and the “Data/Reporting” heading

about reporting on Performance Standards.

4.

The project file is forwarded to the CDD who assigns the project to an

available planner at the weekly Tuesday staff meeting. Depending on the

submittal day, the project is assigned between 1 and 7 calendar days of

submittal.

131.

Recommendation:

Responsibility for project assignment should be

delegated to a Senior Planner if needed, to free up the Director’s time to