Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  81 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 81 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

75

Zucker Systems

Engineering Staff has many years of experience (Asst. Engineer - 15 years;

Assoc. Engineer - 10 years);

The Division has previously used contract staff to address short-term increases

in workload and is currently preparing RFPs to expand use; and

An “Engineer of the Day” is assigned to be the primary technical expert to

address customer and staff inquiries.

C.

O

RGANIZATIONAL

I

SSUES

Leadership and Supervision

Based on the comments provided by customers during the focus group meetings and

written comments provided in customer and employee surveys there is a very high

level of dissatisfaction with the service being provided by this Division. Customers

complain of failure to meet turnaround time commitments, incomplete plan reviews

and the perception that there is a “bottle-neck” in the process at the Senior Civil

Engineer level in the organization. Internal staff complains they are the ones who

must contact customers to alert them that their engineering project won’t be reviewed

on time and that it is difficult to get timely and consistent direction from the

supervisor. We believe there are a number of contributing factors that have led to this

perception of poor service from this Division. However, ultimately it is the

responsibility of the Manager and Supervisor to provide the leadership necessary to

correct the problems.

The most apparent issue we observed is the lack of decision-making authority that has

been given to the Professional Engineers on staff. It is understandable that a

supervisor would exercise closer review of staff work when a new employee joins the

section. However, in the case of the current staffing, these Professional Engineers

have been with the City for 15 and 10 years and should no longer warrant

micromanagement. If staff is continuing to make significant errors in completing their

daily assignments, then a definitive course of action needs to be initiated. Generally,

this begins by establishing clear performance expectations, providing training and

direction as needed and gaining a commitment by all participants that the Division’s

performance must improve in the future.

76.

Recommendation:

The Public Works Director and the Senior Civil

Engineer should develop a comprehensive improvement plan for employee

performance that will allow the Senior Civil Engineer to delegate

appropriate decision making authority to his staff.