Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  78 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 78 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

72

Zucker Systems

Interviews with staff suggest that some of the quality control problems they are

experiencing can be attributed to the influx of new engineering firms now

participating in the development process in Morgan Hill. For many years only local

Engineers submitted plans for development review. Over time, those staff reviewing

the plans and the Engineers submitting the projects developed a strong understanding

of the level of information that should be included in the submittals. This arrangement

resulted in a generally expedited process that rarely required numerous resubmittals.

Unfortunately, the increase in volume of projects being submitted by Engineers

unfamiliar with local requirements has led to a tendency of Engineers to submit plans

with minimal information. This has resulted in the need for far more plan resubmittals

than what was considered ordinary in previous years.

Information provided by employee and customer surveys also expressed a belief that

this group has been reluctant to participate in programs intended to improve customer

service such as embracing the implementation of the TRAKiT permit system as a

means of enhancing accountability and improving the transparency of the review

process. This was the only group that did not complete the requested confidential

employee surveys prior to our on-site interviews.

While this report contains many recommendations intended to enhance customer

service, we acknowledge that some of these improvements will require the acquisition

of additional staff resources. We are also aware that much of the current

dissatisfaction expressed by customers and staff is a direct consequent of what we

believe is insufficient staffing of these programs.

Authority

Section 17.12.030 of the Morgan Hill Municipal code established the duties of the

City Engineer to include the following:

Establishing design and construction details, standards and specifications;

Determining if proposed subdivision improvements comply with the provisions

of this title and the Map Act and for reporting the findings together with any

recommendations for approval, or conditional approval, of the tentative map

to the community development director;

The processing and certification of final maps, reversion to acreage maps, and

amended maps; the processing and approval of subdivision improvement

plans, lot line adjustments, mergers and certificates of compliance;

The inspection and approval of subdivision improvements; and

The acceptance of private improvements (improvements not to be maintained

by the city.)