Previous Page  240 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 240 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUST 1992

5. Site Conditions

It must be clear what site works the

contract price includes. If a lot of

earth removal has to take place

before building can commence is

this included in the price? If the

contractor encounters unexpectedly

difficult ground conditions such as

a soft spot and has to go down

seven foot into the ground for

foundations it should be clear

who is to pay for the extra cost of

this work.

Contractors, particularly those who

construct a large portion of the

building off site, frequently give a

quotation without inspecting the site

on the basis of a site being

reasonably level and soil conditions

being normal. Both parties to a

building agreement should take

great care that the position in

relation to the costs of such works

is clearly set out in writing.

6. It frequently arises in relation to

once-off houses that the parties agree

that the employer will arrange to

have certain parts of the completion

of the house, such as the wiring or

plumbing carried out by himself or

some other contractor on his behalf.

If such an arrangement is made the

terms of it should be confirmed

either in the agreement or by letter.

In particular, it should provide that

the contractor shall be entitled to give

the employer written notice if the

failure to complete any work is

causing delay and should provide

who is to be responsible for any loss

as a result of any such delay.

7. Payment

Practices vary as to how payment for

the contract is to be made. All that

is essential is that whatever payment

schedule is agreed between the

parties be clearly set out in the

schedule of the agreement.

Provisions should be made for

interest on late payments and for a

retention to cover defects appearing

after completion.

Please photocopy this practice note

and file for reference.

Conveyancing

Committee

Standard Form Bank Debentures

Solicitors acting for borrowers are

frequently presented with forms of

debenture or mortgage debenture

which are intended to secure their

clients' liabilities to the lending

bank. The solicitors should advise

the client on the nature of the

commitment to follow from the

client's execution of the debenture.

In many cases these debentures are

pre-printed and include provisions

which are not appropriate to the

particular loan.

In considering whether the debenture

is in an appropriate form, the

solicitor should have sight of the

bank's loan to the client. The

debenture should not do any more

than enable the bank to take security

in the form agreed to by the client.

In certain forms of debenture the

bank in addition to taking a floating

charge will also seek to take a fixed

charge over future acquired assets.

Apart from the consideration of the

validity of such specific provisions,

particularly relating to future

acquired registered land, the facility

offered to the client by the bank

may not in the first instance have

provided for such a charge. The

solicitor should protect his client

from executing a debenture which

reserves to the bank security over

and above what was provided for by

the bank in the loan offer letter and

accepted by the client.

Conveyancing

Committee

VAT on Property Transactions -

A Word of Warning

The Conveyancing Committee has

been contacted by a number of

practitioners who have encountered

difficulties in the area of Value

Added Tax on property transactions.

One such difficulty arose where a

vendor's solicitor inserted into a

contract for sale the usual clause

which provided that the purchaser

would pay to the vendor any Value

Property transactions - practitioners have

encountered difficulties with VAT.

Added Tax which would be chargeable

upon the transaction. The purchaser's

solicitor, acting in good faith and

upon production of what appeared to

be a valid VAT invoice, paid to the

vendor's solicitor at closing the

amount of VAT sought only to have

his claim for a refund of this VAT

disallowed by the Inspector of Taxes

later on the grounds that VAT should

not have been charged on the

transaction in that particular case

because it related to the sale of a

business as a going concern.

Quite clearly, it is not safe to assume

that if one pays VAT on foot of an

invoice bearing all the usual

characteristics that a refund of such

VAT will automatically issue. A claim

for a refund might well be refused on

the grounds that the particular

transaction, for any one of a number

of reasons, might be one which does

not give rise to a VAT charge.

The Committee recognises that the

question of whether VAT should or

should not be chargeable on a

particular transaction is a complex

one and often depends on factors

which a purchaser will not be able to

ascertain. In the light of this, the

Committee has made representations

to the Inspector of Taxes and the

Inspector, in recognising the

difficulties, has suggested that

purchasers' solicitors might contact

the Inspector and show him the

particular invoice on foot of which

payment is sought so as:-

216