Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  160 / 1145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 160 / 1145 Next Page
Page Background

Paper 2: Why embrace the concept of the Safety Requirements Specification?

Institute of Measurement and Control – Functional Safety 2016

8

requirements only, be driven by the needs of the process and specify

requirements not solutions. Contributors to the SRS should imagine themselves

in 10 years time asking "why"?

Why embrace the concept of the Safety Requirements

Specification?

The SRS is a mandatory requirement of IEC 61511. However, for it to be an

effective tool in enhancing functional safety and the safety of hazardous

processes, we need good reasons to dedicate the required time and effort in its

production. The question posed by this paper can be answered with a long list

of points but let’s focus on two.

From experience we can confidently state that developing a safety requirement

specification which focusses on the process and safety functions will lead to a

different solution to that expected.

Better understood hazards lead to better designed and safer solutions.

We need to maintain the connection between the SIS at any point in the safety

lifecycle, with the design intent established at the beginning. The ability to

answer as many questions “why?” will be crucial to making the right decision in

the future.

If specifications (the solution) are not linked to requirements (the

process) then their importance cannot be judged or risk assessed by

others for ---- the ------------ whole ----------------------------- lifecycle.