Background Image
Previous Page  78 / 140 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 78 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

76

S

eptember

2009

www.read-tpt.com

Steel

Supply and demand begin to find balance

in a market driven by China

Here and there – mainly within the force-field of Beijing’s $586bn

stimulus plan for the Chinese economy – the price of steel is

edging up in response to strengthening global demand and higher

raw materials costs. And steel operations are being resumed to

replenish depleted inventories.

China Steel, Taiwan’s leading steel maker, on 21 July announced

plans to restart a key blast furnace in August. The No. 3 furnace,

which ordinarily accounts for one-third of China Steel’s annual output

of 10 million metric tons, is one of four shut down for maintenance in

mid-April and scheduled for reactivation in September. A company

attaché ascribed the accelerated schedule to improved demand in

China, Taiwan, and the USA.

“We have to act quickly once the market is faring well,” this source

told Reuters in Taipei. “In fact, there is room for us to raise prices.”

A day earlier, South Korea’s POSCO announced a second

domestic price increase in a month for its stainless steel. The

world’s No. 6 steel maker said its prices for hot rolled stainless would

rise by an additional 7.1%, to $2,387 a metric ton; for cold rolled by

6.5%, to $2,615, effective 27 July.

POSCO, whose stainless steel business took a loss in the first

quarter, said that the division turned profitable in April and was

expected to show a further profit in the second half as prices recover

in the global steel industry.

On 20 July cold-rolled stainless steel was trading at around $2,550

a metric ton in China, up some 36% from April lows.

As for China itself – the world’s largest steel producing nation,

generating some 35% of total global demand – some contrarian

sentiments about steel production have already been expressed

by a spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Information

Technology. According to Bloomberg News, Zhu Hongren said at

a conference on 22 June in Beijing that China should act now to

contain runaway growth in the domestic steel industry by withholding

project approvals.

Citing figures published by the China Iron and Steel Association

(CISA) for 2008, Mr Zhu reiterated that China’s demand for steel is

about 500 million metric tons per year. Its production capacity is 660

million mt per year.

Bloomberg’s Eugene Tang, in Beijing, noted that crude steel output

in China rose to a record 266.6 million mt in the first half as the

nation’s huge stimulus package spurred demand from builders and

car makers. Annualised, this exceeds the output of 460 million mt

projected by CISA for this year.

“The industry must produce according to market needs, and avoid

adding to excess capacity,” Mr Zhu said. “They should avoid

reckless investments. The government must also take action to

curtail additional investments by companies that are already in

excess.”

Changes in the way iron ore is bought and sold

may be on the way

At this writing, China’s 5 July detention of four executives of Rio

Tinto, the multinational mining group based in Britain and Australia,

has not been resolved. It is not even clear whether the charges

relate to criminal activity or to espionage, corporate or otherwise.

What is definite, however, is that Rio Tinto sells about half its iron

ore on the spot market; and China, the world’s largest customer for

iron ore, vital to steel making, has been pressing mining companies

to slash their ore prices.

In the Asia edition of the Wall Street Journal, Robert Guy Matthews

reported on an unintended consequence of China’s action in the

matter of the Rio Tinto employees: acceleration of a drive by steel

makers and miners alike for greater transparency in the ore market.

(“Industry Pushes New Iron-Ore Pricing Plan,” 20 July)

The proposed agreement – which could be in place by the New

Year, according to miners and steel makers prepared to say even

that much about the developing deal – would set iron-ore contract

prices on a quarterly rather than, as now, an annual basis. Quarterly

sales would likely mean more volatility in global steel prices. But

they would enable steel makers to adjust their prices, up or down,

four times in the course of a year instead of once. Mr Matthews

said: “They might also be likely to rely more on market supply and

demand, and less on secretive criteria, as is currently the case.”

The system now in effect generally involves one miner negotiating

behind closed doors with one big steel maker. While the longer-

G

lobal

M

arketplace