Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  93 / 166 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 93 / 166 Next Page
Page Background

8.

Validation Guidance

:

91

Method developers must provide data for method performance in all the claimed matrices.

92

93

Method developers must provide recovery data using incurred samples for all claimed

94

matrices.

95

96

Add appropriate Appendix reference for PTM requirement (Appendix J).

97

98

Appendix D :

Guidelines for Collaborative Study Procedures To Validate Characteristics of a

99

Method of Analysis

;

19

th

Edition of the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Methods of Analysis

100

(2012). Available at:

http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_d.pdf

101

102

Appendix F :

Guidelines for Standard Method Performance Requirements; 19

th

Edition of the

103

AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official Methods of Analysis (2012). Available at:

104

http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_f.pdf

105

106

Appendix M :

Validation Procedures for Quantitative Food Allergen ELISA Methods:

107

Community Guidance and Best Practices; 19

th

Edition of the AOAC INTERNATIONAL Official

108

Methods of Analysis (2012). Available at:

http://www.eoma.aoac.org/app_m.pdf

109

110

111

Table 1: Method performance requirements (deleted wine section)

112

113

Parameter

Minimum Acceptance Criteria for target matrix

Analytical Range (ppm)

≤ 5 - ≥ 10

LOQ (ppm)

≤5

LOD (ppm)

≤5

Recovery (%)*

50-150%

% RSD

r

≤20 %

% RSD

R

≤ 30%

Note:

ppm dried egg.

*Using incurred samples (acceptance criteria in Appendix M).

114