Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1557 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1557 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

M. Reni et al. / Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 63 (2007) 81–89

83

in the conus-cauda-filum terminale region) and subependy-

moma, a benign, slowly growing intraventricular lesion with

a very favourable prognosis, WHO grade II ependymoma

andWHO grade III anaplastic ependymoma. Ependymoblas-

tomas are being classified as primitive neuroectodermal

tumours (PNET) and must be distinguished from anaplastic

ependymomas.

2.1.1. Myxopapillary ependymoma (WHO grade I)

This entity is characterised by cuboidal tumour cells, with

GFAP expression and lack of cytokeratin expression, sur-

rounding blood vessels in a mucoid matrix. Mitotic activity

is very low or absent.

2.1.2. Subependymoma (WHO grade I)

Subependymoma has isomorphic nuclei in an abundant

and dense fibrillary matrix with frequent microcysts; mitoses

are very rare or absent.

2.1.3. Ependymoma (WHO grade II)

This neoplasm has moderate cellularity; mitoses are rare

or absent and nuclear morphology is monomorphic. Key

histological features are perivascular pseudorosettes and

ependymal rosettes

[14] . F

our histological variants have been

described: cellular ependymoma, which has hypercellularity

and increased mitotic rate, papillary ependymoma, clear cell

ependymoma and tanycytic ependymoma.

2.1.4. Anaplastic ependymoma (WHO grade III)

This tumour is characterised by hypercellularity, cellular

and nuclear pleomorphism, frequent mitosis, pseudopalisad-

ing necrosis and endothelial proliferation. The latter two

criteria do not appear to be independently related to prognosis

[15] .

Perivascular rosettes are a histological hallmark.

2.2. Immunophenotype

2.2.1. Immunophenotype

Ependymomas typically express GFAP, particularly in

pseudorosettes and in grades I–II lesions, S100 protein and

vimentin

[16,17] .

In some cases, focal expression of cytok-

eratins has been observed

[18] ,

while neuronal antigens are

never observed. The proliferation index is variable and is

higher when anaplastic features are present or the patient is

aged

2.3. Genetic features

2.3.1. Genetic features

Data concerning the cytogenetic features of ependymoma

are sparse. Approximately two thirds of patients exhibit cyto-

genetic abnormalities but no primary deletion is evident.

The most frequent abnormal cytogenetic features consist of

monosomy 22 or in various translocations involving chromo-

some 22, which have been detected in approximately 30%

of cases

[19–22] .

The absence of a tumour-suppressor gene

located on chromosome 22 has been suggested. Aberrations

involving chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17,

19 and 20 have been reported less frequently. Ependymomas

are genetically different from astrocytic and oligodendroglial

tumours. No mutations or deletions of the tumour suppres-

sor genes CDKN2A and CDKN2B and no amplification of

CDK4 or CCND1 or EGFR have been described

[23,24] . T

he

p53 gene has only a minor and unclear role in induction of

ependymomas

[25,26] . H

owever, mdm2 gene amplification

has been found in up to 35% of ependymomas

[27] . T

he gene

product MDM2 is believed to act as a cellular regulator of

p53-mediated tumour growth. MDM2 immunopositivity was

detected in 96% of specimens, suggesting not only a role of

mdm2 amplification in the tumorigenesis of ependymoma but

also the presence of a mechanism of MDM2 overexpression

other than gene amplification

[27] .

Analyses of mutations of

the NF2 suppressor gene yielded conflicting results

[28,29] .

It is likely that NF2 mutations are related to spinal ependymo-

mas only

[30] , w

hich constitute a molecular variant, while a

tumour-suppressor gene, independent of the NF2 gene, might

be implicated in the genesis of cerebral ependymomas

[31] .

The cytogenetic aberrations seem to differ between tumours

from adult and younger patients, and between intracranial

and spinal ependymomas

[32] .

3. Diagnosis

3.1. Clinical presentation

Clinical presentation is non-specific, and depends on the

size, location and malignancy of the tumour. Anaplastic

ependymomas give rise to signs and symptoms more rapidly.

Intraventricular ependymomas often cause headache, nau-

sea and vomiting, papilloedema, ataxia, and vertigo due

to increased intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus. The

compression of posterior fossa structures leads to visual dis-

turbances, ataxia and hemiparesis, dizziness and neck pain.

Patients with extraventricular supratentorial ependymomas

may show forgetfulness, behavioural changes and lethargy

with signs like seizures and focal neurological deficits. Spinal

cord lesions are typically associated with back pain of long

duration, and motor or sensory deficits of lower and upper

extremities.

3.2. Localisation

Ependymomas are more commonly infratentorial (60%),

particularly in the fourth ventricle, and in 50% of cases can

extend into the subarachnoid space of the cisterna magna

or the cerebello-pontine angle, or involve the medulla and

upper cervical cord

[33,34] . T

he second most common loca-

tion is the spinal cord, followed by the lateral ventricles and

the third ventricle. Approximately one-half of supratentorial

ependymomas are parenchymal and one-half are primarily

intraventricular, arisingmore often (75%) in the lateral ventri-